2008
DOI: 10.1108/00070700810917983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated farming standards and food eco-labelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eco-labels tend to narrow the environmental friendliness or sustainability of products to the inputs used and/or practices applied along the food chain. The standards are often based on best practice criteria; however, the linkage between the definitions of best practice and what is delivered by those practices is missing (Lewis et al, 2008). In a study on effective approaches to environmental labelling of food products, Lewis (2010) concludes that evidence on the environmental effects of eco-labels and farming standards is inconclusive, which illustrates the surrounding complexities as there are so many variables that could influence environmental quality.…”
Section: To What Extent Do the Labels Take Into Account Impacts And Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eco-labels tend to narrow the environmental friendliness or sustainability of products to the inputs used and/or practices applied along the food chain. The standards are often based on best practice criteria; however, the linkage between the definitions of best practice and what is delivered by those practices is missing (Lewis et al, 2008). In a study on effective approaches to environmental labelling of food products, Lewis (2010) concludes that evidence on the environmental effects of eco-labels and farming standards is inconclusive, which illustrates the surrounding complexities as there are so many variables that could influence environmental quality.…”
Section: To What Extent Do the Labels Take Into Account Impacts And Omentioning
confidence: 99%