2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2005
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2005.1559690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated diagnostics of rocket flight control

Abstract: Abstract-This paper describes an integrated approach to parametric diagnostics demonstrated in a flight control simulation of a space launch vehicle. The proposed diagnostic approach is able to detect incipient faults despite the natural masking properties of feedback in the guidance and control loops. Estimation of time varying fault parameters uses parametric vehicle-level data and detailed dynamical models. The algorithms explicitly utilize the knowledge of fault monotonicity (damage can only increase, neve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude ramp models the growth of the breach as the escaping hot gases burn an opening of increasing size in the SRM case. The augmentation force and moment are as described by (6), (11). In accordance with (5), having an augmented thrust of this magnitude means that 42% of the main engine thrust is lost because of combustion products escaping through the breach.…”
Section: Iiia Redlining -Baseline Approachmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitude ramp models the growth of the breach as the escaping hot gases burn an opening of increasing size in the SRM case. The augmentation force and moment are as described by (6), (11). In accordance with (5), having an augmented thrust of this magnitude means that 42% of the main engine thrust is lost because of combustion products escaping through the breach.…”
Section: Iiia Redlining -Baseline Approachmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Considering axial thrust would make the model nonlinear in vector X. Combining (2), (7), (6), (11), (23), and (24) yields a linear observation model of the form (20), Y (t) = S(t)X(t), where the 4 × 4 sensitivity (fault signature) matrix has the form…”
Section: Iva Linear Gaussian Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example is discussed in [9], where details of the vehicle telemetry data x(t), prediction residuals y(t), unknown faults f (t), and the relevant subsystem prediction models are given. The developed algorithms are applied to the full nonlinear models in [9] and are shown to give good estimates even in the presence of nonlinearities.…”
Section: A Rocket Ascent Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When estimating monotonic signals, the filtering approach based on constrained optimization provides a substantial improvement over standard linear filtering methods. Some applications of optimization-based estimation based on monotonic walk models are discussed in [27], [54]. The source of monotonicity considered there is an irreversible nature of faults in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%