2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(02)00133-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated design method for flip chip CSP with electrical, thermal and thermo-mechanical qualifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Equivalent residual stresses in package Fig. 5 Equivalent residual stresses in solders after cooling from 453°K to 298°K and substrate (same conditions as in Fig. 4) (cooling rate 0.2°K/s) From the graph of the development of the equivalent stress with temperature in point A in Figure 5 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Equivalent residual stresses in package Fig. 5 Equivalent residual stresses in solders after cooling from 453°K to 298°K and substrate (same conditions as in Fig. 4) (cooling rate 0.2°K/s) From the graph of the development of the equivalent stress with temperature in point A in Figure 5 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in practice, it is necessary to obtain an acceptable compromise between the two design objectives. In this current research, this is achieved by coupling the genetic algorithm (GA) with the FE model (Liu et al 2003) of the P-CMUT in order to determine the optimal value of the geometrical design parameters. A schematic of complete design consideration is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ga Optimization Design Of the P-cmutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies only consider the thermal aspect and, in some ways, the micro-mechanical aspects, as contact resistance is found by contact pressure and deformation of the asperities. Even when a thermomechanical coupling is considered for the calculation of the mechanical deformation and pressure in order to determine the thermal contact resistance, the contact pressure is still considered to be uniformly distributed over the surface [11] or not considered at all [12]. When tackling the problem at a macroscopic level, considering the contact pressure as evenly distributed over the surface would be a risky assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when a thermo-mechanical coupling is considered for the calculation of the mechanical deformation and pressure in order to determine the thermal contact resistance, the contact pressure is still considered to be uniformly distributed over the surface 11 or not considered at all. 12 When tackling the problem at a macroscopic level, considering the contact pressure as evenly distributed over the surface would be a risky assumption. This would be far from reality because the distribution of this pressure is very variable, 13 becoming zero in the areas where the contact is lost, and such areas can represent the majority of the interface in some assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%