Abstract:Encountering a problem or error in the final stages of providing products or services increases costs and delays scheduling. The key task is to ensure quality and reliability in the early stages of the production process and prevent errors from occurring from the beginning. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the tools for identifying potential problems and their impact on products and services. The conventional FMEA technique has been criticized extensively due to its disadvantages. In this stud… Show more
“…Table 2 shows the relative weights given by three experts. Relative weights for both the categories was calculated using the equation (3). Then relative weight of main categories is multiplied by relative weight of each categories to get the global weight.…”
From last decade, six sigma is a primary statistical tool for process improvement and also quality improving techniques. The main aim is to study the six sigma methodology and the barriers affecting its implementation and finding solutions to this barrier in Indian MSMEs. This study proposes a composite framework using Modified Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA). The SWARA is used to determine the factors (i.e. barriers) weightings. Which recognize the six sigma barriers and to prioritize the barriers in six sigma implementation. As this methods is among the recent member of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)-family and have found its approach in straighten out number of MCDM problems. Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method- SWARA is a Simplistic and less monochrome method as compared with other MCDM methods .The judgement of SWARA method is based on expert’s capability and experience. This method considers the facts that one attribute is of higher or lower significance than other attributes .This method finds significance ratio of attributes for making decisions. This Study may give remarkable statute to the decision-makers and domain experts to build up their arrangement of organizational activity for short terms as well as for the long haul for MSMEs in implementing six sigma in Indian Industries. Barriers were prioritise and then ranked by using SWARA method. Key Words: Six sigma, Barriers, MCDM and SWARA.
“…Table 2 shows the relative weights given by three experts. Relative weights for both the categories was calculated using the equation (3). Then relative weight of main categories is multiplied by relative weight of each categories to get the global weight.…”
From last decade, six sigma is a primary statistical tool for process improvement and also quality improving techniques. The main aim is to study the six sigma methodology and the barriers affecting its implementation and finding solutions to this barrier in Indian MSMEs. This study proposes a composite framework using Modified Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA). The SWARA is used to determine the factors (i.e. barriers) weightings. Which recognize the six sigma barriers and to prioritize the barriers in six sigma implementation. As this methods is among the recent member of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)-family and have found its approach in straighten out number of MCDM problems. Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method- SWARA is a Simplistic and less monochrome method as compared with other MCDM methods .The judgement of SWARA method is based on expert’s capability and experience. This method considers the facts that one attribute is of higher or lower significance than other attributes .This method finds significance ratio of attributes for making decisions. This Study may give remarkable statute to the decision-makers and domain experts to build up their arrangement of organizational activity for short terms as well as for the long haul for MSMEs in implementing six sigma in Indian Industries. Barriers were prioritise and then ranked by using SWARA method. Key Words: Six sigma, Barriers, MCDM and SWARA.
“…The SWARA method was introduced by Zavadskas et al [59] in 2010, which can rank and determine the weight of criteria. In this method, a group of experts shares their opinions about the options while a researcher takes notes and, based on them, determines the relative weights by ranking them [79]. The SF-SWARA is used in this study to assess the weights of RPN factors considering the probable uncertainty in decision-makerss' views.…”
Accurately recognizing potential failures in the early stages of providing products or services can prevent the loss of investment and time and reduce the risk of safety hazards. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a conventional approach for detecting and prioritizing the probable failures of a product's design or production process. Nevertheless, the traditional risk priority number (RPN) method has come under criticism for its deficiencies. This paper proposes a modified FMEA method based on fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques to cope with the weaknesses of the previous methodologies and improve the primary method. The concept of spherical fuzzy sets (SFS) is utilized to address the vagueness and impreciseness of the information that allows the experts to have more freedom in making decisions by including membership, non-membership, and hesitation of fuzzy sets. Initially, the procedure of assigning weights to the RPN criteria is implemented with SFS step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Then, the failure modes are ranked by the SFS combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method. The effectiveness and practicality of the suggested approach are illustrated through a case study on the Manjil wind farm in Iran. Results show that the suggested model is more reliable and realistic to be utilized in the prioritization of failures than the common FMEA method or other integrated MCDM approaches.
“…Apart from different reliability management tools, the main goal of the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is to identify and prioritize the potential failure modes before a failure arises [ 25 ]. Failure modes with a higher RPN are more important and need to be fixed quickly to avoid or reduce possible risks [ 5 ]. FMEA has been used in various fields due to its application.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWARA method was first introduced by Keršuliene, Zavadskas [ 32 ]. In this method, a group of experts express their opinions about the options freely while a researcher takes notes and determines the relative weights by ranking them based on the evaluation of experts [ 5 ]. The SF-SWARA is applied in this research to evaluate the weights of FMEA parameters considering the probable uncertainty in the views of DMs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors with higher RPN are more significant and will require incite activities to avoid or relieve probable risks [ 5 ]. Though a systematic way to rank risk assessments, this conventional FMEA logic has some disadvantages.…”
There are a lot of elements that make road safety assessment situations unpredictable and hard to understand. This could put people's lives in danger, hurt the mental health of a society, and cause permanent financial and human losses. Due to the ambiguity and uncertainty of the risk assessment process, a multi-criteria decision-making technique for dealing with complex systems that involves choosing one of many options is an important strategy of assessing road safety. In this study, an integrated stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) with measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) approach under a spherical fuzzy (SF) set was considered. Then, the proposed methodology was applied to develop the approach of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for rural roads in Cosenza, southern Italy. Also, the results of modified FMEA by SF-SWARA-MARCOS were compared with the results of conventional FMEA. The risk score results demonstrated that the source of risk (human) plays a significant role in crashes compared to other sources of risk. The two risks, including landslides and floods, had the lowest values among the factors affecting rural road safety in Calabria, respectively. The correlation between scenario outcomes and main ranking orders in weight values was also investigated. This study was done in line with the goals of sustainable development and the goal of sustainable mobility, which was to find risks and lower the number of accidents on the road. As a result, it is thus essential to reconsider laws and measures necessary to reduce human risks on the regional road network of Calabria to improve road safety.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.