2017
DOI: 10.13111/2066-8201.2017.9.2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated CLOS and PN Guidance for Increased Effectiveness of Surface to Air Missiles

Abstract: In this paper, a novel approach has been presented to integrate command to line-of-sight (CLOS) guidance and proportional navigation (PN) guidance in order to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance of CLOS guidance is not reasonably compared with other approaches unless in Yamasaki et al [9] and Bintefatima et al [24] where the true PN (TPN) is employed to perform comparative analyses. Here, to insure a fair comparison in presence of target maneuvers, we have incorporated an ATPN as the benchmark law which suggests the following pursuer acceleration [25] bold-italicap=Nfalse(bold-italicωP×bold-italicVcfalse)+bold-italicat, where bold-italicωP, bold-italicVc, and bold-italicat are respectively LOS rate, closing velocity, and the target acceleration, all expressed in pointing frame (P) where its X P axis always points from the pursuer to target as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Performance of CLOS guidance is not reasonably compared with other approaches unless in Yamasaki et al [9] and Bintefatima et al [24] where the true PN (TPN) is employed to perform comparative analyses. Here, to insure a fair comparison in presence of target maneuvers, we have incorporated an ATPN as the benchmark law which suggests the following pursuer acceleration [25] bold-italicap=Nfalse(bold-italicωP×bold-italicVcfalse)+bold-italicat, where bold-italicωP, bold-italicVc, and bold-italicat are respectively LOS rate, closing velocity, and the target acceleration, all expressed in pointing frame (P) where its X P axis always points from the pursuer to target as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of CLOS guidance is not reasonably compared with other approaches unless in Yamasaki et al [9] and Bintefatima et al [24] where the true PN (TPN) is employed to perform comparative analyses. Here, to insure a fair comparison in presence of target maneuvers, we have incorporated an ATPN as the benchmark law which suggests the following pursuer acceleration [25]…”
Section: Atpn Guidance Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%