Integrated approach to malaria prevention at household level in rural communities in Wakiso district, Uganda: impact evaluation of a pilot project

Abstract

BackgroundThe integrated approach to malaria prevention, which advocates for the use of several malaria prevention methods at households, is being explored to complement other existing strategies. We implemented a pilot project that promoted the integrated approach to malaria prevention in two rural communities in Wakiso district, Uganda.ObjectivesThis paper presents the impact evaluation findings of the project carried out 2 years after implementation with a focus on changes in knowledge and practices on malaria prevention.MethodsThe project evaluation was cross-sectional in design and employed both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. The quantitative survey was conducted among 540 households (household heads being participants) while the qualitative component involved 4 focus group discussions among community health workers (CHWs). Chi-square test was used to compare quantitative results from the evaluation with those of the baseline while thematic analysis was employed for qualitative data.ResultsThere was a statistically significant positive change in malaria prevention practices in the evaluation compared with the baseline regarding indoor residual spraying (χ2 = 7.9, p = 0.019), mosquito screening of windows and ventilators (χ2 = 62.3, p = 0.001), and closing windows of houses before 6:00 pm (χ2 = 60.2, p < 0.001). The CHWs trained during the project were found to be highly knowledgeable on the various malaria prevention methods in the integrated approach, and continued to promote their use in the community.ConclusionFindings of the impact evaluation give promise that utilisation of integrated malaria prevention can be enhanced if use of multiple methods is promoted in communities.

Integrated malaria prevention in rural communities in Uganda: a qualitative feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

“…Other studies elsewhere have also shown a high willingness of community members to support malaria control interventions beyond ITNs and IRS [ 39 , 40 ]. Previous concerns and challenges in the use of several malaria prevention interventions holistically have been related to high costs, methods being many hence time consuming, limited knowledge on some methods and potential negative health effects [ 22 , 40 , 41 ]. Similar issues were highlighted in our study which require careful consideration in the design and implementation of the RCT especially as they would influence adoption of practices.…”

Biolarviciding for malaria vector control: Acceptance and associated factors in southern Tanzania

“…Malaria remains endemic in at least 87 countries in the world, including Tanzania ( National Bureau of Statistics of Tanzania, 2018 ; WHO, 2019 ). Strategies to control the disease involve adoption of integrated vector control methods that mainly involve the use of techniques that target adult mosquitoes such as long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying ( Musoke et al., 2018 ). However, these methods are challenged by mosquito development of resistance to the commonly used insecticides and changes in biting behaviors ( Corbel et al., 2012 ; Walker et al., 2016 ; Choi and Furnival-Adams, 2019 ).…”

Interface of non-communicable diseases and infections in Africa

“…A treatise on infectious diseases would be incomplete without malaria34; brucellosis35; Candida albicans 36; Culex pipiens ;37,38; antibiotic prescriptions39; and antibiotic resistance with the so called super bugs!40…”