2019
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated analysis of genomic and transcriptomic profiles identified a prognostic immunohistochemistry panel for esophageal squamous cell cancer

Abstract: Background:The poor outcome of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) highlights the importance of the identification of novel effective prognostic biomarkers. We aimed to identify a clinically applicable prognostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel for ESCC. Methods: An integrated analysis was performed to screen and establish a prognostic panel using exome sequencing profile from 81 pairs of ESCC samples and RNA expression microarray data from 119 ESCC subjects. Two independent ESCC cohorts w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combination of these biomarkers as a panel may be a useful tool for increasing predicted accuracy. So IHC panel might be great helpful for accurate prognostication, development of better surgical care and chemoradiotherapeutic regimes, and identification of novel therapeutics are key areas to address of ESCC (36,37). On the other hand, the IHC panel could be easily adopted by existing pathology service to determine the status for these biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combination of these biomarkers as a panel may be a useful tool for increasing predicted accuracy. So IHC panel might be great helpful for accurate prognostication, development of better surgical care and chemoradiotherapeutic regimes, and identification of novel therapeutics are key areas to address of ESCC (36,37). On the other hand, the IHC panel could be easily adopted by existing pathology service to determine the status for these biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e risk scores were verified as prognostic factors for EC OS and a classifier for the evaluation of groups with different risks. Since the underlying biological mechanisms of most ESCC biomarkers remains unclear, screening through candidate or pathway-based strategies rather than systematic screening results in limited prediction effect [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%