2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-006-0108-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated 3D density modelling and segmentation of the Dead Sea Transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, variations in long‐term lithospheric strength may also correspond with segmentation of the southern DSF. For example, Götze et al [2007] documented variations in long‐term, flexural rigidity (effective elastic thickness) along the southern DSF consistent with inferred seismogenic segmentation. Those authors found weaker elastic lithosphere around the Dead Sea (and areas northward) compared with the Wadi Araba region.…”
Section: Discussion and Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Additionally, variations in long‐term lithospheric strength may also correspond with segmentation of the southern DSF. For example, Götze et al [2007] documented variations in long‐term, flexural rigidity (effective elastic thickness) along the southern DSF consistent with inferred seismogenic segmentation. Those authors found weaker elastic lithosphere around the Dead Sea (and areas northward) compared with the Wadi Araba region.…”
Section: Discussion and Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The effective elastic thickness (T e ) of the DSR flanks has been estimated as 11–12.5 km [ Basile and Allemand , ] and 10 km in the field area by Götze et al . []. These relatively low values indicate that the flexural wavelengths are similar or smaller than the 100–120 km wide zone bordering the DSR where most of the erosion has occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 5 km east of the AF, several small outcrops of Cretaceous sediments (sticking out of the recent deposits) confirm that here the basement is shallower than 1 km. Furthermore, the gravity anomalies along the seismic section show [ Tašárová et al , 2006; Götze et al , 2006] that no significant structural depression was crossed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%