2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INTEGRATE-HTA: THE PERSPECTIVE OF EUnetHTA

Abstract: The HTA Core Model (HTACM) of EUnetHTA and the INTEGRATE-HTA Model (IHTAM) both provide HTA experts with advanced guidance on how to assess health technologies. In this study, we examine the similarities and differences of the two models, identifying synergies and opportunities for future collaboration. We also consider how such an alignment of the HTACM and IHTAM might be done in practice and present some alternative practical approaches. Overall the two models share several similarities, primarily the percep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, compressive approximation from a health technology assessment approach conducted from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment in different models could improve the general process of the DM to form complex new technologies. 13 The independence of the NITAGs is critical in accordance with their goals and necessary legitimacy. A NITAG is both a technical resource and a deliberative body to empower the national authorities and policy makers to make evidence-based decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, compressive approximation from a health technology assessment approach conducted from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment in different models could improve the general process of the DM to form complex new technologies. 13 The independence of the NITAGs is critical in accordance with their goals and necessary legitimacy. A NITAG is both a technical resource and a deliberative body to empower the national authorities and policy makers to make evidence-based decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the semantic difference between 'scientific assessment' and 'prescriptive appraisal' of technologies [20], with only the latter implying some form of recommendation, the former would have not justified the EU huge investments. Without a real impact on health policy decision making, it is hard to claim that the EU should still fund HTA because of a lack of qualified human resources [39]-e.g., health economists [40]. Yet, to regret that the dominant paradigm has become CEA instead of REA [32], although shareable, seems like just one more argument for a 'never ending story'.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Lampe and Schnell-Inderst (12) examine the similarities and differences between the INTEGRATE-HTA Model and the HTA Core Model® that has been developed by EUnetHTA. Identifying synergies and opportunities for future collaboration they present three options how both models could be aligned in future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%