1992
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650150403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral transform solution for the lid‐driven cavity flow problem in streamfunction‐only formulation

Abstract: The basic ideas in the generalized integral transform technique are further advanced to allow for the hybrid numerical-analytical solution of the two-dimensional steady Navier-Stokes equations in streamfunctiononly formulation. The classical lid-driven square cavity problem is selected for illustration of the approach. The corresponding biharmonic-type non-linear partial differential equation for the streamfunction is integral transformed in one of the co-ordinates and an infinite system of coupled non-linear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Верификацию также проводят с применением высокоточных решений системы дифференциальных уравнений в частных производных для определенных граничных условий. Например, используют решения, полученные для случаев: несжимаемого ламинарного течения над полубесконечной плоской пластиной [70,74,78], несжимаемого ламинарного течения жидкости в квадратной каверне с движущейся крышкой [149][150][151][152][153], несжимаемого ламинарного течения около круглого цилиндра бесконечной длины [44,45,57,154]. Очевидно, что гарантируемая точность эталонных решений снижается при переходе от обыкновенных дифференциальных уравнений к уравнениям в частных производных.…”
Section: рис 3 комплексный подход к верификации в вычислительной гаunclassified
“…Верификацию также проводят с применением высокоточных решений системы дифференциальных уравнений в частных производных для определенных граничных условий. Например, используют решения, полученные для случаев: несжимаемого ламинарного течения над полубесконечной плоской пластиной [70,74,78], несжимаемого ламинарного течения жидкости в квадратной каверне с движущейся крышкой [149][150][151][152][153], несжимаемого ламинарного течения около круглого цилиндра бесконечной длины [44,45,57,154]. Очевидно, что гарантируемая точность эталонных решений снижается при переходе от обыкновенных дифференциальных уравнений к уравнениям в частных производных.…”
Section: рис 3 комплексный подход к верификации в вычислительной гаunclassified
“…Besides the well-known semi-inverse superposition method [12] that was applied for some simple plate problems, few new analytic methods have been found in the literature, including the symplectic approach [13][14][15][16], Fourier-type finite integral transform method [17,18], etc. It is notable that the one-dimensional generalized finite integral transform method has been applied in the fields of thermodynamics and fluid mechanics [19,20], by which solving PDEs reduces to solving ordinary differential equations where special mathematical techniques are still required. This paper presents a first endeavor to extend the one-dimensional generalized finite integral transform to two-dimensional transform for new analytic bending solutions of orthotropic rectangular thin foundation plates, with focus on typical clamped plates that were difficult to solve by the other analytic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are flexural rigidities in the x and y directions, respectively; is the deflection,   , q x y the load, and K the Winkler foundation modulus.The following two-dimensional generalized finite integral transform pair is defined:Yy are the vibrating beam functions[20]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a relatively short period of time it was extended to different classes of problems, including nonlinear diffusion and convection-diffusion [16][17][18][19] and irregular domains in parabolic and elliptic formulations [20][21][22][23]. It would not take long for the GITT to be challenged by the solution of fluid flow problems governed either by the boundary layer equations or the Navier-Stokes equations [24,25]. Since then, the hybrid method was progressively extended and new classes of problems and applications have been dealt with, and it has been reviewed at different stages and sources [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral transform analysis of fluid flow problems governed by the Navier-Stokes equations has required the proposition of new eigenfunction expansions, other than those normally employed in diffusion or convection-diffusion problems, directly derived from the general Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem. Along the years, in the present methodological context, the Navier-Stokes equations have been mostly dealt with in the streamfunction-only formulation [25,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], and less frequently in the primitive variables formulation [47,48]. In two-dimensional problems, the streamfunction formulation offers the advantages of automatically satisfying the continuity equation and eliminating the pressure field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%