2003
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.812718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral methods for analysis and design of low-frequency conductive shields

Abstract: This paper presents and compares two different approaches to the analysis and design of nonferrous shields for extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. The first method is based on a circuital approach where the shield is modeled by a set of conductors coupled with each other by a matrix of self and mutual inductances. The second technique is based on an algebraic formulation of electromagnetic fields and adapted by means of integral equations to the analysis of thin conductive sheets. The paper shows the accu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The third comparison, referred to U-shaped shields at the frequency of 50 Hz, is again with the results presented in Reference [2] based on FEM-BEM but also with the ones presented in Reference [6] based on a circuital approach (multiconductor model, MCM).…”
Section: Comparison With Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The third comparison, referred to U-shaped shields at the frequency of 50 Hz, is again with the results presented in Reference [2] based on FEM-BEM but also with the ones presented in Reference [6] based on a circuital approach (multiconductor model, MCM).…”
Section: Comparison With Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The validation based on other numerical methods consists in comparisons with results published in technical literature [2,6,15,16] that are based on different techniques.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finite element (FEM) and finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods have been developed to calculate eddy currents at the cost of massive computer calculations and inaccurate handling of complex boundary conditions [63,96]. The boundary element method (BEM) discretises active parts only while avoiding simulating the air [97]. The network methods based on a semi-analytical solution of the diffusion equation of the eddy currents in thick cylinders and the multi-layer integral method (MIM) have been employed to simulate eddy current phenomena in irregular geometries induced by gradient coils of arbitrary geometry [77,98].…”
Section: Eddy Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%