2008
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2008.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral Geometry of Tensor Fields on a Class of Non-Simple Riemannian Manifolds

Abstract: We study the geodesic X-ray transform IΓ of tensor fields on a compact Riemannian manifold M with non-necessarily convex boundary and with possible conjugate points. We assume that IΓ is known for geodesics belonging to an open set Γ with endpoints on the boundary. We prove generic s-injectivity and a stability estimate under some topological assumptions and under the condition that for any (x, ξ) ∈ T * M , there is a geodesic in Γ through x normal to ξ without conjugate points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
150
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See the book of J. Sjöstrand [14] for more details. Actually Stefanov-Uhlmann in [16,Prop.2] have proved the statement of the proposition with f replaced by a solenoidal symmetric tensor field. Their proof carries over here with straightforward modifications and in fact the arguments for functions are simpler.…”
Section: Analytic Regularity Of F Along Conormal Directions Of γ ∈ Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See the book of J. Sjöstrand [14] for more details. Actually Stefanov-Uhlmann in [16,Prop.2] have proved the statement of the proposition with f replaced by a solenoidal symmetric tensor field. Their proof carries over here with straightforward modifications and in fact the arguments for functions are simpler.…”
Section: Analytic Regularity Of F Along Conormal Directions Of γ ∈ Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One needs additional restrictions on the metric even to prove injectivity results for this transform as the following counterexample shows [16]: Consider the unit sphere with a small disk excised out from its east pole making the resulting manifold a smooth manifold with boundary. Now consider a function f = 1 on a small disk centered at the north pole and f = −1 on a symmetrical disk centered at the south pole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem for generic metrics is solved in [19,20]. In [21], the linear problem is considered under some assumption that is weaker than the simplicity. There is also a couple of results for manifolds with nonconvex boundary [16,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [182] for more details about the results in this section. It turns out that a linearization of the lens rigidity problem is again the problem of s-injectivity of the ray transform I .…”
Section: Results About the Linear Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that we will also consider the case of incomplete data, that is when we don't have information about all the geodesics entering the manifold. More details can be found in [182,183].…”
Section: Lens Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%