2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2021.3071295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral-Free Spatial Orientation Estimation Method and Wearable Rotation Measurement Device for Robot-Assisted Catheter Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To derive an absolute upper error bound for the MKCL, we consider the scalar case of (6). In this scenario,…”
Section: B Estimation Of a Constant Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To derive an absolute upper error bound for the MKCL, we consider the scalar case of (6). In this scenario,…”
Section: B Estimation Of a Constant Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMUs have several advantages over optical motion capture systems, including their low cost, small size, and ability to function outside of indoor environments. Recently, IMUs have been utilized in health monitoring [4], joint angle estimation [5], and robot control [6]. These applications require IMUs to maintain their precision in a disturbed environment and expect a faster execution frequency and longer work time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we propose to leverage 4 sensors to avoid the inconvenience of wearing multiple sensors, decrease cost and facility requirements, and achieve human motion tracking with good usability [46]. Considering that IMUs are easily affected by electromagnetic interference [11] and less flexible as they require a drift-avoidance configuration that prevents position deviation and inaccurate direction measurement [2,33], we employ four flexible sensors to track human motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically for TAVI and despite its advantages over AVR, its main technical limitation is the loss of natural tactile sensing. Especially in robot-assisted surgeries, e.g., with the system proposed in [ 6 ], the loss of tactile feedback is shown to adversely affect the ability of surgeons in estimation of tool–tissue interaction force or tissue distinction [ 7 , 8 ]. Consequently, surgeons are less situationally aware of the surgical site during TAVI procedures, which may result in risky surgical maneuvers and irreversible or catastrophic trauma to the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%