1988
DOI: 10.1049/ip-a-1.1988.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral formulation for 3D eddy-current computation using edge elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
127
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
127
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The major considerations for a good three dimensional model are the establishment of the correct formulation and derivation of the quantities of interest such as eddy current densities, flux densities and coil impedance from the solution. Many different formulations [21][22][23][24][25] have been presented and used, each having its own advantages and disadvantages. Three dimen sional modeling is concerned not only with the problem of discretization difficulties, but also with the vector nature of the application.…”
Section: Scope Of the Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major considerations for a good three dimensional model are the establishment of the correct formulation and derivation of the quantities of interest such as eddy current densities, flux densities and coil impedance from the solution. Many different formulations [21][22][23][24][25] have been presented and used, each having its own advantages and disadvantages. Three dimen sional modeling is concerned not only with the problem of discretization difficulties, but also with the vector nature of the application.…”
Section: Scope Of the Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the meshes and consequently the matrices involved in the calculations have to be updated during the motion and the analysis of unbounded domains requires special treatments [21]. Alternative approaches, mostly based on integral formulations such as the one used in this paper, have a number of characteristics that make them well suited for the analysis of electromechanical systems [22]. In particular, the problem of coupling moving meshes does not arise when integral formulation is used to simulate these kind of systems, since only the discretization of the active regions is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a magnetoquasistatic problem can be also formulated in terms of integral equations [16][17][18]. Integral equations allow, in general, to concentrate the mesh in the conducting and magnetic regions only and regularity conditions of the field at the infinity are automatically satisfied; as a drawback, they lead to a full system of equations, compared with the sparse system yielded by the discretization of partial differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will concentrate mainly on the geometric aspects at the base of the integral formulation and on the discretization process which yields to a discrete differential system of equations from the original integral equation governing an eddy-current problem in linear media. The resulting integral geometric formulation can also treat non-topologically trivial domains by resorting to the techniques already described originally in [16,19] for multiply connected regions or more generally in [20][21][22] and we will not give the details here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%