Integral Estimate of Socio-Ecological-Economic Factors on the Quality of Life of Population of the Region

Garifova, L.F.; Kundakchyan, Rezeda M.; Pratchenko, O.V.

doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n12p117

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Social ecological economics is a conceptual and methodological approach which recognises the dynamic interaction of economy, society and ecology across space and time. In contrast to neo-classical economics, social ecological economics focuses not only on questions of efficiency and distribution, but on institutions, power relations, uncertainty, and ignorance within the context of interactions between the economy, society, and the environment with the aim of a transition towards sustainability (Spash 2011;Garifova et al 2014;Matthies et al 2017;Spash 2017;Spash, Smith 2019;Spash, Guisan 2021). This theoretical framework is relevant to the analysis of the cost-of-living crisis within distinct social settings in Europe and at a global level.…”

Section: Conceptual Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The purpose of this chapter is to examine the economic, social, and environmental conditions underlying the cost-of-living crisis and its impact on social and health inequalities in the UK. This examination is framed within the theoretical lens of social ecological economics premised on the view that economic, social, and environmental conditions are interactive and interdependent (Spash 2011;Daly 2013;Garifova et al 2014;Matthies et al 2017;Spash, Smith 2019;Hanacˇek et al 2020;Spash, Guisan 2021). Within this theoretical framework sustainable economic systems are conceptualised as systems which replicate themselves without generating social and ecological crises (Daly 2013;Matthies et al 2017;Nelson, Power 2018;Hanacˇek et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Cost-of-Living Crisis in the UK: An Economy on the Edge

Ellison¹

2023

Colloquium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter examines the economic, social and environmental conditions underlying the cost-of-living crisis and its impact on social and health inequalities in the UK. This examination adopts a theoretical approach based upon social ecological economics premised on the view that economic, social, and environmental conditions are interactive and interdependent. The chapter provides an analysis of key factors underpinning the cost-of-living crisis in the UK, including, the UK’s departure from the European Union, the Covid-19 pandemic, the ecological implications of climate change and th e conflict in Ukraine. The central argument of the chapter is that the impact of the cost-of-living crisis on the profile and depth of poverty and health inequalities in distinct societies is shaped by the economic, social, and environmental circumstances that people experience during infancy, childhood development, employment, environment, and ageing. These circumstances are forged within a broader set of forces and systems including distinct economic policies and systems, political systems and social, health, educational, environmental policies. These specificities are critical to understanding the impact of broader global factors on the cost of living within distinct societal contexts. A central finding of the chapter is that whilst a range of global factors have contributed to the cost-of-living crisis in the UK, a substantive body of economic analysis conducted during 2021 and 2022 clearly evidences that the cost-of-living crisis in the UK has been significantly worsened by the economic and labour market impacts of the UK’s departure from the European Union.

show abstract

Section: Conceptual Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Cost-of-Living Crisis in the UK: An Economy on the Edge

Ellison¹

2023

Colloquium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The development of the food industry is due to the situation in agricultural production. The distance of raw areas from processing centers, the poor harvesting network in rural areas, a rise in price of gasoline and diesel fuel, shortage of raw materials affected the reduction in the volume of output; processors found themselves in financial difficulty, the technical level of processing enterprises decreased [4]. Currently, the main factors that prevent the enterprises of food and processing industries increase profitability have arrived mass sufficient to create the necessary accumulation fund to ensure the expanded reproduction of fixed assets (their modernization and technical re-equipment) and working capital financing to the extent necessary for the ensure continuous production of products are: a reduction in agricultural production, the high tax burden, the rise in price of energy and transport services.…”

Section: Advances In Economics Business and Management Research Volmentioning

confidence: 99%

Food Safety in Market Economy

Battalova¹,

Garaeva²,

Sannikov³

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the International Conference "Economy in the Modern World" (ICEMW 2018)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food safety issues are best decided in terms of efficient markets. Dependence on alternative sources exists, but in the case of underproduction by natural disasters (drought, flood, crop failure), even those countries that have a policy of food self-sufficiency are forced to rely on imports. The participants of the economic debate on the issue of the relationship of food self-sufficiency and food security are divided into two sides: the first believe that self-sufficiency is the only guarantee of food security in the long term plan; others rely on the free trade system capable of ensuring long-term food security for all.

show abstract

“…), including real counterparts, defined in terms of reliability and efficiency of the organization and production and economic activity -only a few hundred in the whole country [6].…”

Section: Food Security Of Russia: the Comparative-historical Aspectmentioning

confidence: 99%