2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2005.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral closedness of MI and the formula of Hoskin and Deligne for finitely supported complete ideals

Abstract: We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for a finitely supported monomial ideal I in a polynomial ring of dimension at least three for MI to be integrally closed. This is obtained via the higher-dimensional analogue of the formula of Hoskin and Deligne for the length of a finitely supported ideal in a regular local ring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let I be an m-primary complete ideal in a 2-dimensional regular local ring (R, m). We say that a The Hoskin-Deligne formula has been generalized for finitely supported mprimary ideals in regular local rings of dimension at least three by C. D'Cruz [7]. B. Johnston [22] established a multiplicity formula for the same class of ideals.…”
Section: Normal Hilbert Polynomials In Two Dimensional Regular Local ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let I be an m-primary complete ideal in a 2-dimensional regular local ring (R, m). We say that a The Hoskin-Deligne formula has been generalized for finitely supported mprimary ideals in regular local rings of dimension at least three by C. D'Cruz [7]. B. Johnston [22] established a multiplicity formula for the same class of ideals.…”
Section: Normal Hilbert Polynomials In Two Dimensional Regular Local ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, even for a normal ideal I the product mI need not be integrally closed, see [DC2,Example 7.1].…”
Section: It Follows Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special cases of Theorem 3.18 and Proposition 3.19 appear in [DC1]. In general, even for a normal ideal I the product mI need not be integrally closed, see [DC2,Example 7.1]. Proposition 3.19.…”
Section: We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is true for clusters are investigated in homological terms in [19]. If C is a configuration, as in the case of constellations, σ C : X C → X will denote the composition of the blowing-ups of all the points in C; moreover two configurations C and C ′ over X are identified if there exist an automorphism π of X and an isomorphism π ′ :…”
Section: Characteristic Cones Of Toric Constellationsmentioning
confidence: 99%