Abstract:Abstract. A system of semi-discrete coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations is studied. To show the complete integrability of the model with multiple components, we extend the discrete version of the inverse scattering method for the single-component discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation proposed by Ablowitz and Ladik. By means of the extension, the initial-value problem of the model is solved. Further, the integrals of motion and the soliton solutions are constructed within the framework of the extension of… Show more
“…Comprehensive accounts of its scattering theory were given in [6] and [24]. In [6,24] the matrix equations (1.1a), (1.1b) were studied in detail using the IST.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive accounts of its scattering theory were given in [6] and [24]. In [6,24] the matrix equations (1.1a), (1.1b) were studied in detail using the IST. In [1,25] the defocussing N = M = 1 problem was studied for potentials not vanishing as n → ±∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This forward difference scheme leads to the spectral problem (1.2) which lacks forward-backward symmetry and requires the assumption that the square matrix of order N + M describing the transition v n → v n+1 is invertible for each n ∈ Z. In fact, the authors of [6,24] found it useful to essentially "scalarize" the nonlinear evolution system (1.1a), (1.1b) by requiring the potentials {U n } ∞ n=−∞ and {W n } ∞ n=−∞ to also satisfy the condition U n W n = W n U n = c n I N , n∈ Z, (1.4) where N = M and, for each n ∈ Z, c n ( = 1) is an unknown complex number. Assuming (1.4), in the focusing case the scattering matrix, when multiplied by a weight matrix, appears to be symplectically unitary [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without assuming condition (1.4), a priori information on the IDNLS solution is required. After the N -soliton and breather solutions to (1.1a), (1.1b) under condition (1.4) were derived before in terms of solutions to N × N linear systems [24,Eq. (3.43)], breather solutions were constructed before by using the Hirota method [7], and one and two soliton solutions were derived by various methods [5], an extensive family of IDNLS solutions in terms of triplets of matrices parametrizing the Marchenko kernel was derived in [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time evolution of the reflection coefficients, norming constants, and Marchenko kernels associated with the discrete Zakharov-Shabat system (1.2) leading to IDNLS solutions has been explained in detail in [6], also without assuming condition (1.4). The renormalized Marchenko equations given in [6,10,24] have the form…”
In this article we develop the direct and inverse scattering theory of a discrete matrix Zakharov-Shabat system with solutions U n and W n . Contrary to the discretization scheme enacted by Ablowitz and Ladik, a central difference scheme is applied to the positional derivative term in the matrix Zakharov-Shabat system to arrive at a different discrete linear system. The major effect of the new discretization is that we no longer need the following two conditions in theories based on the Ablowitz-Ladik discretization: (a) invertibility of I N − U n W n and I M − W n U n , and (b) I N − U n W n and I M − W n U n being nonzero multiples of the respective identity matrices I N and I M .
“…Comprehensive accounts of its scattering theory were given in [6] and [24]. In [6,24] the matrix equations (1.1a), (1.1b) were studied in detail using the IST.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive accounts of its scattering theory were given in [6] and [24]. In [6,24] the matrix equations (1.1a), (1.1b) were studied in detail using the IST. In [1,25] the defocussing N = M = 1 problem was studied for potentials not vanishing as n → ±∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This forward difference scheme leads to the spectral problem (1.2) which lacks forward-backward symmetry and requires the assumption that the square matrix of order N + M describing the transition v n → v n+1 is invertible for each n ∈ Z. In fact, the authors of [6,24] found it useful to essentially "scalarize" the nonlinear evolution system (1.1a), (1.1b) by requiring the potentials {U n } ∞ n=−∞ and {W n } ∞ n=−∞ to also satisfy the condition U n W n = W n U n = c n I N , n∈ Z, (1.4) where N = M and, for each n ∈ Z, c n ( = 1) is an unknown complex number. Assuming (1.4), in the focusing case the scattering matrix, when multiplied by a weight matrix, appears to be symplectically unitary [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without assuming condition (1.4), a priori information on the IDNLS solution is required. After the N -soliton and breather solutions to (1.1a), (1.1b) under condition (1.4) were derived before in terms of solutions to N × N linear systems [24,Eq. (3.43)], breather solutions were constructed before by using the Hirota method [7], and one and two soliton solutions were derived by various methods [5], an extensive family of IDNLS solutions in terms of triplets of matrices parametrizing the Marchenko kernel was derived in [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time evolution of the reflection coefficients, norming constants, and Marchenko kernels associated with the discrete Zakharov-Shabat system (1.2) leading to IDNLS solutions has been explained in detail in [6], also without assuming condition (1.4). The renormalized Marchenko equations given in [6,10,24] have the form…”
In this article we develop the direct and inverse scattering theory of a discrete matrix Zakharov-Shabat system with solutions U n and W n . Contrary to the discretization scheme enacted by Ablowitz and Ladik, a central difference scheme is applied to the positional derivative term in the matrix Zakharov-Shabat system to arrive at a different discrete linear system. The major effect of the new discretization is that we no longer need the following two conditions in theories based on the Ablowitz-Ladik discretization: (a) invertibility of I N − U n W n and I M − W n U n , and (b) I N − U n W n and I M − W n U n being nonzero multiples of the respective identity matrices I N and I M .
We will propose a unified algebraic method to construct Jacobi elliptic function solutions to differential-difference equations (DDEs). The solutions to DDEs in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions sn, cn and dn have a unified form and can be presented through solving the associated algebraic equations. To illustrate the effectiveness of this method, we apply the algorithm to some physically significant DDEs, including the discrete hybrid equation, semi-discrete coupled modified Korteweg-de Vries and the discrete Klein-Gordon equation, thereby generating some new exact travelling periodic solutions to the discrete Klein-Gordon equation. A procedure is also given to determine the polynomial expansion order of Jacobi elliptic function solutions to DDEs.
This paper aims to formulate the fractional quasi-inverse scattering method.Also, we give a positive answer to the following question: can the Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur (AKNS) method be applied to the space-time fractional nonlinear differential equations? Besides, we derive the Bäcklund transformations for the fractional systems under study. Also, we construct the fractional quasi-conservation laws for the considered fractional equations from the defined fractional quasi AKNS-like system. The nonlinear fractional differential equations to be studied are the space-time fractional versions of the Kortweg-de Vries equation, modified Kortweg-de Vries equation, the sine-Gordon equation, the sinh-Gordon equation, the Liouville equation, the cosh-Gordon equation, the short pulse equation, and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.