2014
DOI: 10.1111/muse.12070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
32

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
102
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Of central importance and continuing influence internationally is the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, convened by UNESCO in 2003. While global heritage conservation efforts in earlier decades often focused on tangible elements -cultural sites, monuments and objects -the inclusive consideration of intangible heritage over the past decade has not been merely a realignment of attention but a realisation of the interconnectedness of both the tangible and the intangible in the lifeways of communities (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 2004). Recent essays in music have examined extinction and endangerment (Marett 2010), musical safeguarding from linguistic perspectives (Grant 2012(Grant , 2014 and cultural rights (Weintraub and Yung 2009).…”
Section: Historical Preservation and Colonial Heritage Management In mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of central importance and continuing influence internationally is the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, convened by UNESCO in 2003. While global heritage conservation efforts in earlier decades often focused on tangible elements -cultural sites, monuments and objects -the inclusive consideration of intangible heritage over the past decade has not been merely a realignment of attention but a realisation of the interconnectedness of both the tangible and the intangible in the lifeways of communities (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 2004). Recent essays in music have examined extinction and endangerment (Marett 2010), musical safeguarding from linguistic perspectives (Grant 2012(Grant , 2014 and cultural rights (Weintraub and Yung 2009).…”
Section: Historical Preservation and Colonial Heritage Management In mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kirshenblatt-Gimblett (2004) asserts that natural heritage is an inappropriate label. By virtue of human interaction and interpretation, all natural landscapes are culturally inscribed, understood and valued (Latour, 1999).…”
Section: Safeguarding the Past/futurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Not so much because 'intangible' can be equated with 'immaterial', but rather because this heritage connects with the broader framework of post-industrial capitalism. In fact, the distinction between tangible and intangible heritage is flawed: it reproduces the Western modern dualism of soul/matter and disregards the fact that heritage is always both a tangible and intangible process (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 2004). Similarly, there is a misunderstanding about the cognitive economy as a virtual field of immaterial value while, in reality, the material cannot be replaced by the immaterial.…”
Section: Cognitive Economies and The New Rents On The Commonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heritage is a present-centred phenomenon and a discourse with material consequences (Smith 2006). It is a social construction and a metacultural process of selection, as there is no 'heritage' before somebody starts to preserve, remember, reclaim, enhance or celebrate something (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 2004). Clearly, people have always used 'retrospective memories as resources of the past to convey a fabricated sense of destiny for the future.…”
Section: The Heritage Conundrummentioning
confidence: 99%