SAE Technical Paper Series 2012
DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intake Manifold Length Effects on Turbocharged Gasoline Downsizing Engine Performance and Fuel Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The manifold length or pipe length was changed from 500 mm to around 2000 mm whereas speed varied from 1500 rpm to 3000 rpm. Taylor et al, [51] simulated a 1400 cc turbocharged gasoline engine on the GT power CFD simulation tool. They studied the consequence of changing manifold length for said engine.…”
Section: Effect Of Variation In Shape and Tuning Of Intake Portsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manifold length or pipe length was changed from 500 mm to around 2000 mm whereas speed varied from 1500 rpm to 3000 rpm. Taylor et al, [51] simulated a 1400 cc turbocharged gasoline engine on the GT power CFD simulation tool. They studied the consequence of changing manifold length for said engine.…”
Section: Effect Of Variation In Shape and Tuning Of Intake Portsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such "positive" tuning is normally reserved for highspeed, high-performance NA engines where knock is unlikely to occur. In 2012, Taylor and collaborators at Mahle investigated tuning effects on a downsized turbocharged gasoline engine [324]. The standard turbocharged engine method "inert tuning"-use of very short intake runners to avoid wave action-was compared to conventional intake tuning for increasing volumetric efficiency and "anti-tuning," where the goal was to have low pressure at IVC.…”
Section: The 2010s: Aggressive Co 2 Targets Electrification and Downs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. investigated a gasoline engine of 1.4 liter turbocharged in a GT Power engine simulation tool and found that the induction tuning increase the consumption by 5% over baseline [4]. Jae-soon Lee et al studied an optimal design of the intake system by varying different parts such as volume of the plenum chamber, length of intake manifold and surge tank and plenum chamber [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%