2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intake and digestive responses by ruminants fed fresh temperate pasture supplemented with increased levels of sorghum grain: A comparison between cattle and sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another paper derived from the present experiment, we reported that the increase in the percentage of supplementation led to differential responses in feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and microbial synthesis in cattle and sheep fed temperate forage (Aguerre et al., ). In cattle, the increase of sorghum in the diet was effective in enhancing feed intake and digestive utilisation of the diet, while in sheep it resulted in a high ruminal fermentation that reduced fibre digestibility and total OM intake (Aguerre et al., ). These different responses between species probably determined different patterns in the glucose homeostatic mechanisms in cattle and sheep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In another paper derived from the present experiment, we reported that the increase in the percentage of supplementation led to differential responses in feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and microbial synthesis in cattle and sheep fed temperate forage (Aguerre et al., ). In cattle, the increase of sorghum in the diet was effective in enhancing feed intake and digestive utilisation of the diet, while in sheep it resulted in a high ruminal fermentation that reduced fibre digestibility and total OM intake (Aguerre et al., ). These different responses between species probably determined different patterns in the glucose homeostatic mechanisms in cattle and sheep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…() could be explained by greater glucose absorption from the small intestine and/or greater hepatic or renal gluconeogenesis. Supplemented cattle had greater starch intake than non‐supplemented ones (9.52 vs. 0.87 ± 0.08 g/kg of BW, p < 0.05; Aguerre et al., ). Because, according to Offner et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations