2011
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Int22h-1/int22h-2-mediated Xq28 rearrangements: intellectual disability associated with duplications and in utero male lethality with deletions

Abstract: Background X linked intellectual disability (XLID) is common, with an estimated prevalence of 1/1000. The expanded use of array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) has led to the identification of several XLID-associated copy-number variants. Methods Array CGH analysis was performed using chromosomal microarray with w105 000 oligonucleotides covering the entire genome. Confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridisation analyses were subsequently performed. Chromosome X-inactivation (XCI) was assessed using me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
76
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(36 reference statements)
9
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These duplications are probably not associated with HA, as they coexisted with other molecular defects clearly responsible for HA. Contrary to a previous report and based on our study results, 21 these duplications do not appear to be associated with intellectual disability.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These duplications are probably not associated with HA, as they coexisted with other molecular defects clearly responsible for HA. Contrary to a previous report and based on our study results, 21 these duplications do not appear to be associated with intellectual disability.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, a new 0.5-Mb reciprocal deletion between int22h-1 and int22h-2 copies was reported in a normal female. As suggested by Pegoraro et al 27 and El-Hattab et al 21 , these deletions may be lethal for males in utero but have no phenotypic consequences in females, as they result in completely skewed chromosome X inactivation. As CGH is an increasingly used screening method in prenatal diagnosis and patients with cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, this 0.5 Mb deletion or the corresponding duplication is likely to be increasingly (a) Misalignment of two normal maternal X chromatids during meiosis, which may result in a NAHR mechanism in an unequal crossing over that provides copies with the duplication of 0.5 Mb between the int22h-1 and int22h-2 copies or the deletion of 0.5 Mb.…”
Section: Intron 22 Homologous Regionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome (TAR, MIM# 274000) region on 1q21 (Klopocki et al 2007;Albers et al 2012) and the 1q21.1 deletion/duplication syndrome region (MIM# 612474, 612475) (Brunetti-Pierri et al 2008;Mefford et al 2008) found in neuropsychiatric traits such as schizophrenia and autism (The International Schizophrenia Consortium 2008; Stefansson et al 2008), in addition to three adjacent regions on chromosome 2q12.2q13 (Liu et al 2012), were collapsed in previous reports but were separated by our analyses. Moreover, using the less stringent criterion for the length of flanking DP-LCRs copies, we have identified the STS deletions and duplications on Xp22.31 (MIM# 308100) (Hernández-Martín et al 1999;Liu et al 2011) that were not included in the analysis by Cooper et al (2011) and CNVs in Xq28 (El-Hattab et al 2011) that were not detected by the approach used by Liu et al (2012).…”
Section: Bioinformatic Genome-wide Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%