1975
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.30.12.1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insurance reimbursement: A mixed blessing.

Abstract: The American Psychologist as the official organ of the American Psychological Association attempts to publish articles of broad general interest to the membership. When the positions advanced are controversial, comments are often solicited from others holding different opinions. Such is the case with the following article on insurance reimbursement. Readers are urged to read both the article and the four comments immediately following.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third-party payment policies and the prospects for national health insurance have enormous implications, ranging from who will receive care to the qualifications of providers and the range of services attracted by or permitted in this newly lucrative marketplace (Meltzer 1975, Gross 1978, Edwards et al 1979. Nowhere is the link between funding and pressures on research more clear than in the monitoring of care by professional standards review organizations whose charts will perforce define "proper" treatment, whatever data may or may not be available.…”
Section: Influences: Urgency and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Third-party payment policies and the prospects for national health insurance have enormous implications, ranging from who will receive care to the qualifications of providers and the range of services attracted by or permitted in this newly lucrative marketplace (Meltzer 1975, Gross 1978, Edwards et al 1979. Nowhere is the link between funding and pressures on research more clear than in the monitoring of care by professional standards review organizations whose charts will perforce define "proper" treatment, whatever data may or may not be available.…”
Section: Influences: Urgency and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, economists, sociologists, and political scientists have long observed that there are costs inherent in occupational regulation. These potential liabilities include (a) increased consumer vulnerability because regulation does not, in fact, protect the public as it promises to do (Gross, 1978;Hogan, 1979); (b) discrimination against some competent practitioners (Hogan, 1980); (c) increased costs of services (Collins, 1979;Meltzer, 1975;Rottenberg, 1980); (d) loss of public power and control (Reiff, 1974); and(e) professional stagnation (Danish & Smyer, 1981;Rogers, 1973).…”
Section: Identified Consequences Of Regulatory Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the history of professionalization in public health occupations shows, changes in the legislative authority of the professions concerned have usually been followed by the establishment of remuneration through health insurance companies. A controversial and much discussed article by Meltzer (1975) addressed itself frankly to several problematic issues. The arguments are briefly presented here in critical assessment of the present situation.…”
Section: Legislation Concerning the Profession Of Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%