Abstract:Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in youth is a challenging chronic medical condition. Its management should address not only the glycemic control but also insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease risk factors which are increasingly recognized to be present in youth with TID. Current knowledge on the mechanisms of insulin resistance in T1DM is reviewed. The use of adjunctive therapies that are beneficial to achieve adequate glycemic control while mitigating the effects of insulin resistance are discussed wi… Show more
“…Our metformin group result was similar to some reported studies 4,5,7. For instance, a meaningful decrease in TG and PPG or a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose level have been reported in metformin group compared with placebo based on different studies 4,5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For instance, a meaningful decrease in TG and PPG or a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose level have been reported in metformin group compared with placebo based on different studies 4,5. However, there are some controversial aspects about metformin consequences on regular insulin intake, HbA1C or BMI index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin is the core treatment of T1DM. Achieving stable blood glucose levels and adequate hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)and preventing the development of micro vascular and macro vascular complications are the main goals of treatment in T1DM 5,6. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial has shown that intensive insulin regimens to reduce glucose to near-normal levels are associated with delays in incidence and progression of diabetes-related complications 3,4,7…”
Objective:All the aforementioned data have stimulated interest in studying other potential therapies for T1DM including noninsulin pharmacological therapies. The present study attempts to investigate the effect of adjunctive therapy with metformin and acarbose in patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus.Method:In a single-center, placebo-controlled study (IRCT201102165844N1) we compared the results of two clinical trials conducted in two different time periods on 40 patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus. In the first section, metformin was given to the subjects. After six months, metformin was replaced with acarbose in the therapeutic regimen. In both studies, subjects were checked for their BMI, FBS, HbA1C, TGs, Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, 2hpp, unit of NPH and regular insulin variations.Results:Placebo-controlled evaluation of selected factors has showna significant decrease in FBS and TG levels in the metformin group during follow up but acarbose group has shown substantial influence on two hour post prandial (2hpp) and regular insulin intake decline. Moreover, Comparison differences after intervention between two test groups has shown that metformin has had superior impact on FBS and HbA1C decline in patients. Nonetheless, acarbose treatment had noteworthy influence on 2hpp, TGs, Cholesterol, LDL, and regular insulin intake control.Conclusion:The results of this experiment demonstrate that the addition of acarbose or metformin to patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus who are controlled with insulin is commonly well tolerated and help to improve metabolic control in patients.
“…Our metformin group result was similar to some reported studies 4,5,7. For instance, a meaningful decrease in TG and PPG or a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose level have been reported in metformin group compared with placebo based on different studies 4,5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For instance, a meaningful decrease in TG and PPG or a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose level have been reported in metformin group compared with placebo based on different studies 4,5. However, there are some controversial aspects about metformin consequences on regular insulin intake, HbA1C or BMI index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin is the core treatment of T1DM. Achieving stable blood glucose levels and adequate hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)and preventing the development of micro vascular and macro vascular complications are the main goals of treatment in T1DM 5,6. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial has shown that intensive insulin regimens to reduce glucose to near-normal levels are associated with delays in incidence and progression of diabetes-related complications 3,4,7…”
Objective:All the aforementioned data have stimulated interest in studying other potential therapies for T1DM including noninsulin pharmacological therapies. The present study attempts to investigate the effect of adjunctive therapy with metformin and acarbose in patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus.Method:In a single-center, placebo-controlled study (IRCT201102165844N1) we compared the results of two clinical trials conducted in two different time periods on 40 patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus. In the first section, metformin was given to the subjects. After six months, metformin was replaced with acarbose in the therapeutic regimen. In both studies, subjects were checked for their BMI, FBS, HbA1C, TGs, Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, 2hpp, unit of NPH and regular insulin variations.Results:Placebo-controlled evaluation of selected factors has showna significant decrease in FBS and TG levels in the metformin group during follow up but acarbose group has shown substantial influence on two hour post prandial (2hpp) and regular insulin intake decline. Moreover, Comparison differences after intervention between two test groups has shown that metformin has had superior impact on FBS and HbA1C decline in patients. Nonetheless, acarbose treatment had noteworthy influence on 2hpp, TGs, Cholesterol, LDL, and regular insulin intake control.Conclusion:The results of this experiment demonstrate that the addition of acarbose or metformin to patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus who are controlled with insulin is commonly well tolerated and help to improve metabolic control in patients.
“…A substantial enrichment of differentially variable CpG positions was observed in these three different cell types from T1D twins, 126 suggesting the contribution of DNA methylation of B cells to T1D development. Although there is little evidence showing the association of epigenetic modifications in B cells with the pathogenesis of T1D, epigenetic drugs such as 5-Aza, 127 HDACs 128,129 and HDAC inhibitors 130,131 may exert their therapeutic effects on T1D via modifying B-cell activation and differentiation. Thus further studies on the potential link between abnormal epigenetic regulation of B cells and T1D may broaden our understanding of T1D pathogenesis (Table 1).…”
B cells have a critical role in the initiation and acceleration of autoimmune diseases, especially those mediated by autoantibodies. In the peripheral lymphoid system, mature B cells are activated by self or/and foreign antigens and signals from helper T cells for differentiating into either memory B cells or antibody-producing plasma cells. Accumulating evidence has shown that epigenetic regulations modulate somatic hypermutation and class switch DNA recombination during B-cell activation and differentiation. Any abnormalities in these complex regulatory processes may contribute to aberrant antibody production, resulting in autoimmune pathogenesis such as systemic lupus erythematosus. Newly generated knowledge from advanced modern technologies such as next-generation sequencing, single-cell sequencing and DNA methylation sequencing has enabled us to better understand B-cell biology and its role in autoimmune development. Thus this review aims to summarize current research progress in epigenetic modifications contributing to B-cell activation and differentiation, especially under autoimmune conditions such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes.
“…With the advent of improved insulins and delivery systems such as insulin pumps, technology to measure glucose levels in real time such as continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), approval of the first automated hybrid closed loop systems (USA), emerging data from the use of adjunct therapies such as GLP1 analogs, SGLT inhibitors, and fixed dose and fixed ratio combinations of therapeutics with or without insulin, it behooves the research and clinical communities to exploit all options to understand the benefit/burden profiles of treatments and optimize care of patients [130][131][132] . This calls for deep phenotyping of individuals, including assessment of critical markers of disease onset and progression, such as age at onset, disease duration, body weight, insulin sensitivity, C-peptide level, adiposity, metabolic syndrome parameters, time in and out of desirable glucose range, glycemic variability, and plasma and urine markers suggestive of vascular diseases.…”
Type 1 diabetes, a disorder characterized by immune-mediated loss of functional pancreatic beta cells, is a disease continuum with specific presymptomatic stages with defined risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Prognostic biomarkers have been developed for disease staging and for stratification of subjects that address the heterogeneity in rate of disease progression. Using biomarkers for stratification of subjects at different stages of type 1 diabetes will enable smaller and shorter intervention clinical trials with greater effect size. Addressing the heterogeneity of the disease will allow precision medicine-based approaches to prevention and interception of presymptomatic stages of disease and treatment and cure of symptomatic disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.