2017
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin resistance improvement by cinnamon powder in polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized double‐blind placebo controlled clinical trial

Abstract: Our aim is to assess the effect of cinnamon powder capsules on insulin resistance, anthropometric measurements, glucose and lipid profiles, and androgens of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Out of 80 women that were diagnosed as PCOS by Rotterdam Criteria, 66 were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. All of the PCOS women were taking medroxy progesterone acetate 10 mg/day for the last 10 days of their menstrual cycles. The cases were randomly allocated to 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
105
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
105
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the studies used cinnamon powder in the form of capsule (17 studies) (Akilen et al, ; Aldayel, ; Askari et al, ; Azimi et al, ; Blevins et al, ; Borzoei et al, ; Gupta Jain et al, ; Haghighian et al, ; Hajimonfarednejad et al, ; Mirfeizi et al, ; Nakhaei et al, ; Shishehbor et al, ; Soni & Bhatnagar, ; Torabi et al, ; Vafa et al, ; Wainstein et al, ; Zare et al, ), and the four remaining studies used the cinnamon extract (Anderson et al, ; Talaat & Ammar, ; Weitgasser et al, ; Ziegenfuss et al, ). The 11 trials were conducted in individuals with T2DM (Akilen et al, ; Azimi et al, ; Blevins et al, ; Haghighian et al, ; Mirfeizi et al, ; Soni & Bhatnagar, ; Torabi et al, ; Vafa et al, ; Wainstein et al, ; Weitgasser et al, ; Zare et al, ), and the other trials included women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) (three trials) (Borzoei et al, ; Hajimonfarednejad et al, ; Talaat & Ammar, ), participants with overweight (two trials) (Aldayel, ; Nakhaei et al, ), MetS and prediabetes (three trials) (Anderson et al, ; Gupta Jain et al, ; Ziegenfuss et al, ), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (one trials) (Askari et al, ), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (one trial) (Shishehbor et al, ). In general, the administered dose of cinnamon for these included trials ranged between 336 mg/d of cinnamon extract to 10,000 mg/day of cinnamon powder.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of the studies used cinnamon powder in the form of capsule (17 studies) (Akilen et al, ; Aldayel, ; Askari et al, ; Azimi et al, ; Blevins et al, ; Borzoei et al, ; Gupta Jain et al, ; Haghighian et al, ; Hajimonfarednejad et al, ; Mirfeizi et al, ; Nakhaei et al, ; Shishehbor et al, ; Soni & Bhatnagar, ; Torabi et al, ; Vafa et al, ; Wainstein et al, ; Zare et al, ), and the four remaining studies used the cinnamon extract (Anderson et al, ; Talaat & Ammar, ; Weitgasser et al, ; Ziegenfuss et al, ). The 11 trials were conducted in individuals with T2DM (Akilen et al, ; Azimi et al, ; Blevins et al, ; Haghighian et al, ; Mirfeizi et al, ; Soni & Bhatnagar, ; Torabi et al, ; Vafa et al, ; Wainstein et al, ; Weitgasser et al, ; Zare et al, ), and the other trials included women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) (three trials) (Borzoei et al, ; Hajimonfarednejad et al, ; Talaat & Ammar, ), participants with overweight (two trials) (Aldayel, ; Nakhaei et al, ), MetS and prediabetes (three trials) (Anderson et al, ; Gupta Jain et al, ; Ziegenfuss et al, ), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (one trials) (Askari et al, ), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (one trial) (Shishehbor et al, ). In general, the administered dose of cinnamon for these included trials ranged between 336 mg/d of cinnamon extract to 10,000 mg/day of cinnamon powder.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No indication of bias because of selective reporting or attrition was observed. In total, seven trials had a low risk of bias (Akilen et al, ; Askari et al, ; Gupta Jain et al, ; Hajimonfarednejad et al, ; Shishehbor et al, ; Wainstein et al, ; Zare et al, ), 12 trials were judged to be “unclear risk” (Anderson et al, ; Blevins et al, ; Borzoei et al, ; Haghighian et al, ; Mirfeizi et al, ; Nakhaei et al, ; Soni & Bhatnagar, ; Talaat & Ammar, ; Torabi et al, ; Vafa et al, ; Weitgasser et al, ; Ziegenfuss et al, ), and two studies were “high risk” (Aldayel, ; Azimi et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations