2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin resistance and cognitive dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present meta-analysis of nine comparisons out of six studies showed a combined RR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.64-0.95, p = 0.015, I 2 = 55.1%) for incident dementia associated with insulin sensitizers, indicating that insulin sensitizer drugs might reduce the incidence rate of dementia by 22%, which concurred with previous experimental researches revealing that insulin resistance was involved at many levels of the onset and progression of dementia [14,15]. Furthermore, compared to the 4.88% reduction of incident dementia after DM was eliminated from all modifiable risk factors in the study by Ritchie et al [25], a 22% reduction of risk was more favorable, which also offered proof to the assumption made earlier that insulin sensitizers possibly functioned to prevent dementia via mechanisms independent of their blood glucose-lowering properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present meta-analysis of nine comparisons out of six studies showed a combined RR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.64-0.95, p = 0.015, I 2 = 55.1%) for incident dementia associated with insulin sensitizers, indicating that insulin sensitizer drugs might reduce the incidence rate of dementia by 22%, which concurred with previous experimental researches revealing that insulin resistance was involved at many levels of the onset and progression of dementia [14,15]. Furthermore, compared to the 4.88% reduction of incident dementia after DM was eliminated from all modifiable risk factors in the study by Ritchie et al [25], a 22% reduction of risk was more favorable, which also offered proof to the assumption made earlier that insulin sensitizers possibly functioned to prevent dementia via mechanisms independent of their blood glucose-lowering properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A growing body of evidence from both laboratory and animal studies has linked insulin resistance to the development and progression of dementia resulting from promoting Aβ accumulation, deposition, and progression of neurodegeneration. High Aβ levels and insulin resistance both lead to neuronal injury via inflammatory and oxidative stress processes in AD [14,15]. Thus, insulin sensitizers might impact cognition not only by controlling DM (one of the most modifiable risk factors of dementia) but also by regulating insulin resistance and related impaired insulin signaling in central nervous system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent results also suggest that DM could partly affect the dendritic morphology in the occipital cortex, prefrontal cortex and hippocampus (Martinez-Tellez et al, 2005). Aβ accumulation in the brain is the feature of aging and cognitive ability is decreased during the development of pathophysiology, especially in AD and MCI induced by DM (Ma et al, 2015). A number of studies had proved that inflammation promoted the Aβ peptide to aggregate rapidly (Philippens et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with diabetes have higher risks of MCI, particularly memory ability, than those without diabetes (Cheng et al, 2012). Several explanations for the link between diabetes and cognitive dysfunction have been provided, including chronic hyperglycemia (Strachan et al, 2011), recurrent hypoglycemia (Muratli et al, 2015), insulin deficiency (Ma et al, 2015), reduced cerebral blood flow(Strachan et al, 2011; Glodzik et al, 2013; Nealon et al, 2016), amyloid β (Aβ) deposition (Yang and Song, 2013), tau protein hyperphosphorylation (McCrimmon et al, 2012) and so on. However, the exact mechanism remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%