2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.252478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin and Insulin-like Growth Factor II Differentially Regulate Endocytic Sorting and Stability of Insulin Receptor Isoform A

Abstract: Background: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) II interacts with IR-A and is a more powerful mitogen than insulin. Results: IGF-II and insulin differ in regulating insulin receptor (IR)-A trafficking and stability. Conclusion: Compared with insulin, IGF-II induces lower IR-A and downstream effectors activation but protects IR-A and IRS-1 from down-regulation, thereby evoking a sustained mitogenic stimulus. Significance: These results further elucidate the mechanisms controlling IR-A biological responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
92
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endocytic sorting of IR-A differs depending on whether it is activated by insulin or IGF-II. Stimulation with insulin results in the degradation of IR-A and IRS-1, whereas IGF-II protects IR-A and IRS-1 from degradation, which may be responsible for the prolonged activation observed in p70S6 kinase and ERK (33). This evidence supports the role for different ligands, IGF-II, or insulin in this case, producing various effects via the same receptor, IR-A.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Endocytic sorting of IR-A differs depending on whether it is activated by insulin or IGF-II. Stimulation with insulin results in the degradation of IR-A and IRS-1, whereas IGF-II protects IR-A and IRS-1 from degradation, which may be responsible for the prolonged activation observed in p70S6 kinase and ERK (33). This evidence supports the role for different ligands, IGF-II, or insulin in this case, producing various effects via the same receptor, IR-A.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The mechanisms of this preference are not clear, but analogs with a slow receptor dissociation rate demonstrated more mitogenic signaling (Hansen et al, 1996). The different affinities and binding properties of the insulin analogs may be able to effect IR trafficking and internalization, which can influence levels of ERK activation Morcavallo et al, 2012). However, unlike XMetA, these insulin analogs are all orthosteric binders and, importantly, act as full agonists of the IR, with maximal levels of receptor activation similar to that of insulin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In further contrast with insulin, all concentrations of IGF1 reduced phosphorylation of ERK relative to control levels in the A. stephensi midgut. Recent work by Morcavallo et al (Morcavallo et al, 2012) suggests how ligand binding at a single receptor could mediate such different responses: phosphorylation of the insulin receptor (IR-A) and downstream Akt and ERK varied with the affinity of the receptor for insulin, insulin analogs and IGF2. When low-affinity ligands bound the receptor, phosphorylation was reduced (compared with high-affinity ligands) and endocytosis-mediated receptor downregulation was inhibited (Morcavallo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%