1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.6877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulator-to-metal transition in Kondo insulators under a strong magnetic field

Abstract: Magnetization curve and changes of the single-particle excitation spectra by magnetic field are calculated for the periodic Anderson model at half-filling in infinite spatial dimension by using the exact diagonalization method. It is found that the field-induced insulator-to-metal transition occurs at a critical field H c , which is of the order of the single ion Kondo temperature. The transition is of first order, but could be of second order in the infinite system size limit. These results are compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the experimental normalized magnetization M nor exhibits a linear dependence p-5 on B N (marked by two arrows), while the calculated magnetization is approximately constant. Such a behavior is the intrinsic shortcoming of the HF liquid model that accounts for only heavy electrons and omits the conduction electrons of other kind [13,14]. Thus, we can consider the high-field (at B N > 1) part of the magnetization as the contribution which is not included in our theory.…”
Section: Consider Now the Magnetization M (B T ) As A Function Of Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the experimental normalized magnetization M nor exhibits a linear dependence p-5 on B N (marked by two arrows), while the calculated magnetization is approximately constant. Such a behavior is the intrinsic shortcoming of the HF liquid model that accounts for only heavy electrons and omits the conduction electrons of other kind [13,14]. Thus, we can consider the high-field (at B N > 1) part of the magnetization as the contribution which is not included in our theory.…”
Section: Consider Now the Magnetization M (B T ) As A Function Of Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20) and (21). In the limit V + = V − and B = B c = B f , which corresponds to the simpler mean field theory described in Ref.…”
Section: Mean Field Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have worked in the limit g c = 0 so that the field couples only to the impurity spin and not at all to the conduction electrons, 18,19,20,21,22,23 but we do not believe that this is the correct starting point. A more common assumption is to set the two g-factors equal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without using the full orbital degeneracy, one could alternatively use the g-factors of the real materials. Other authors have even completely neglected the coupling of the magnetic field to conduction band states arguing that the corresponding g factor is negligible 7,8,9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without using the full orbital degeneracy, one could alternatively use the g-factors of the real materials. Other authors have even completely neglected the coupling of the magnetic field to conduction band states arguing that the corresponding g factor is negligible 7,8,9 .We employ the dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) 10 in combination with the modified perturbation theory (MPT) 11 to determine the one-electron Green's function, from which the excitation spectrum as well as magnetization, effective mass and other quantities can be calculated. This method has previously been applied to the paramagnetic 12 and the ferromagnetic PAM 13 , so we can confine ourselves to a short summary: The underlying idea of the DMFT is that the local self-energy such as occurs in the limit of infinite spatial dimensions 14,15 , can be taken to be that of an appropriately defined single-impurity Anderson model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%