2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1646-706x(13)70017-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insuficiência renal induzida por contraste: estudo prospectivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important risk factor reported in most articles was the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). Going against the results of Antunes et al [34], who evaluated 54 hospitalized patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, in which the prevalence of ARF was 24.1% in 13 cases, precisely in patients with DM and SAH, being less prevalent in patients without DM and SAH. It was also noted that ARF in most patients was irreversible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important risk factor reported in most articles was the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). Going against the results of Antunes et al [34], who evaluated 54 hospitalized patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, in which the prevalence of ARF was 24.1% in 13 cases, precisely in patients with DM and SAH, being less prevalent in patients without DM and SAH. It was also noted that ARF in most patients was irreversible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Regarding the volume of contrast used in the procedure, it was shown that large volumes, resulting from longer procedure times, become a risk factor for ARF. Antunes et al [34] evaluated 54 patients who received the average volume of 234.8 mL of contrast, with 209.7 mL in diagnostic procedures and 345.5 mL in therapeutic. There were 33.4% of cases of ARF, which were related to the majority of patients who received higher doses of contrast volume, being explained by the longer time of cardiac catheterization and requiring the use of more contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 9 Although controversial, it is believed that CM are responsible for induction of renal vasoconstriction, which is the main cause of the renal ischemia and tubular toxicity. 10 , 11 Finally, the ischemia causes reactive oxygen species (ROS) to form, which compound the ischemia and exacerbate kidney damage, preventing filtration and, primarily, tubular reabsorption. 5 , 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fisiopatologia da NIC consiste em uma disfunção súbita da função renal que ocorre entre 24 e 72 horas após a administração de meios de contraste (MC) 8 , 9 . Embora controverso, acredita-se que o MC seja responsável por induzir a vasoconstrição renal, a qual seria a principal causadora da isquemia renal e da toxicidade tubular 10 , 11 . A isquemia, por fim, causa a formação de espécies reativas de oxigênio (ROS), que, somadas à isquemia, aumentam a lesão renal, dificultando a filtração e principalmente a reabsorção tubular 5 , 6 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified