2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02852-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insufficient radiofrequency ablation promotes the metastasis of residual hepatocellular carcinoma cells via upregulating flotillin proteins

Abstract: PurposeRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy has proven to be effective and feasible for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, rapid progression of residual tumor cells after RFA has been confirmed, but the molecular mechanisms of this phenomenon are poorly understood. This study evaluated the effect of the lipid raft proteins known as flotillins on the invasive and metastatic potential of residual HCC.MethodsThe human HCC cell line HCCLM3 was used to establish insufficient RFA models in vivo an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in condition of suboptimal cancer treatment, metastasis formation is enhanced, as reported for small-size hepatocellular carcinoma with insufficient radiofrequency ablation. When hepatocellular carcinoma cells are heat-treated to mimic this process, flotillin upregulation is observed [67].…”
Section: Flotillin Role In Tumorigenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in condition of suboptimal cancer treatment, metastasis formation is enhanced, as reported for small-size hepatocellular carcinoma with insufficient radiofrequency ablation. When hepatocellular carcinoma cells are heat-treated to mimic this process, flotillin upregulation is observed [67].…”
Section: Flotillin Role In Tumorigenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in the case of multinodular or large HCC lesions, the initial CR sharply drops to almost 50% [18]. Insu cient RFA would possibly promote the proliferation of residual HCCs [34], accelerate metastasis in a variety of ways [35], and further contribute to a lower OS rate in patients with HCCs treated by RFA [36]. Because RFA does not remove the corresponding hepatic segment fed by the tumor-bearing portal tributaries [37], arterioportal stula and intratumoral shunt develop, intratumoral pressure suddenly increases during RFA treatment, resulting in the intravascular spread of tumor cells [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the limitations of the background of liver and the liver function situation, postoperative complications also need to be taken into account. RFA surgery is the relatively safe treatment approach, but the stability and thoroughness for RFA to treat liver cancer are difficult to determine [10,11]. Although the evaluation of effectiveness between the two approaches is still in debate, in Western countries, especially in the United States, the treatment guidelines on liver cancer consistently require surgical resection for early liver cancer if the liver function allows and if there is no high vein pressure [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%