2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insufficient quality of sputum submitted for tuberculosis diagnosis and associated factors, in Klaten district, Indonesia

Abstract: Background: Sputum smear microscopy is the standard diagnostic method for detection of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Insufficient quality of sputum might result in missing cases. In this study we aimed at assessing the quality of sputum in a district in Central Java and determining patient and health worker factors associated with submission of three good quality sputum samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
34
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with these shortcomings the substantial increase in bacterial load observed in VV versus NV sputum samples suggests that simple visual inspection may be a potential method of assessing sample quality. Our results support a growing body of evidence that suggests that emphasis on collecting and testing higher-quality samples is a relatively simple low-cost way to improve operational sensitivity (30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Studies that use M. tuberculosis Cts to compare bacterial load within or between patients should ensure samples of comparable quality are being assessed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Even with these shortcomings the substantial increase in bacterial load observed in VV versus NV sputum samples suggests that simple visual inspection may be a potential method of assessing sample quality. Our results support a growing body of evidence that suggests that emphasis on collecting and testing higher-quality samples is a relatively simple low-cost way to improve operational sensitivity (30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Studies that use M. tuberculosis Cts to compare bacterial load within or between patients should ensure samples of comparable quality are being assessed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is difficult to confirm on bacteriological examination of sputum, notably if only microscopy is available [3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in many other tests of pulmonary function (39,40), cough-generated aerosol production is effort dependent and probably varies with motivation, strength, sense of well-being, and other factors. However, collection of sputum specimens is also limited by similar issues (41,42).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%