Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector 1997
DOI: 10.4135/9781446217658.n7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instruments for Network Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Of course, not all work on policy instruments has restricted itself to implementation issues. Work on the exploration of "instrumentation" for example, has considered larger issues about feedback processes from instrument choices to the politics of policy formation, as has some work on instruments and network governance (see de Bruijn & ten Heuvelhof, 1997;Lascoumes & Le Gales, 2007). However these can still be distinguished from the new design studies, given the latter's almost exclusive emphasis on formulation and its resulting concern for understanding the inherent nuances involved in developing mechanisms for meeting policy goals, couched within contextual realities, which the former studies still lack.…”
Section: Modeling Non-design: Revisiting the Pre-conditions Of Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Of course, not all work on policy instruments has restricted itself to implementation issues. Work on the exploration of "instrumentation" for example, has considered larger issues about feedback processes from instrument choices to the politics of policy formation, as has some work on instruments and network governance (see de Bruijn & ten Heuvelhof, 1997;Lascoumes & Le Gales, 2007). However these can still be distinguished from the new design studies, given the latter's almost exclusive emphasis on formulation and its resulting concern for understanding the inherent nuances involved in developing mechanisms for meeting policy goals, couched within contextual realities, which the former studies still lack.…”
Section: Modeling Non-design: Revisiting the Pre-conditions Of Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, as Kickert and Koppenjan (1997: 39) point out, in networks, -government is not the single dominant actor that can unilaterally impose its will. Hierarchicial, central top-down steering does not work in networks.‖ Rather, governance mechanisms must fit within the network structure (Bruijn and Heuvelhof 1997). Yet the ongoing influence of top-down performance management regimes, so strong in countries such as the UK where vertical accountability remains characteristic of public services, may militate against this need, to the extent that the network may become little more than an instrument of surveillance and performance management, to the detriment of collaborative efforts by network managers and members (Addicott et al 2007).…”
Section: Network and Leadership: Obstacles And Impedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that managing a pilot project that aims to stimulate an innovation process differs significantly from traditional forms of project planning or operational steering, both of which tend to focus on preset goals, efficiency, and content (van Mierlo et al 2010a). Project managers should take the characteristics of complex networks into account, as well as the nonlinearity of negotiation processes (de Bruijn & ten Heuvelhof, 1995;de Bruijn et al 2010). If the managers of the PV pilot projects take demonstrable action to form a heterogeneous network and facilitate open and creative negotiations, they are presumed to be managing the network.…”
Section: Conditions Conducive To Learning and Subsequent Niche Develomentioning
confidence: 99%