1989
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198971060-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumented measurements of laxity in patients who have a Gore-Tex anterior cruciate-ligament substitute.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lateral subluxations were consequently rare. Our results agree with Markolf et al who concluded that anterior tibial displacement alone is not a good indicator of the quality of anterior cruciate reconstruction [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Lateral subluxations were consequently rare. Our results agree with Markolf et al who concluded that anterior tibial displacement alone is not a good indicator of the quality of anterior cruciate reconstruction [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results concerning improved stability for Goretex-reconstructed knees are in agreement with, or even better than, other reports (Indelicato et al 1989, Markolf et al 1989. The lower functional and activity scores among Goretex patients were due to pain and effusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Their biocompatibility, biodegradability and extraordinary material properties make them exceptional candidates for biomedical applications. The success of tissue engineering relies on achieving synchronized rates of scaffold degradation and new tissue formation (Langer and Vacanti, 1993), where the degradation of biomaterials should match the functional needs and ensure optimum mechanical and physiological integration of the scaffold (Bonnarens and Drez, 1987;Dunn et al, 1993;Dürselen et al, 2001;Kumar and Maffulli, 1999;Lu et al, 2000;Markolf et al, 1989;Richmond et al, 1992;Vepari and Kaplan, 2007). The rate and extent of degradation of natural polymers is variable, depending on structural and morphological features of the polymers (e.g., crystallinity, roughness), processing conditions and location of implantation (Arai et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%