1991
DOI: 10.1016/0011-2275(91)90202-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentation for highly sensitive measurement of magnetocaloric effect: application to high Tc superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…when the temperature sensor is in direct thermal contact with the sample) and non-contact techniques (i.e. when the sample temperature is measured without the sensor being directly connected to the sample) (30,33,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52). Since during the direct MCE measurements a rapid change of the magnetic field is generally required, the measurements can be carried out on immobilized samples when the magnetic field change is provided either by charging/discharging the magnet, or by moving the sample in and out of a uniform magnetic field volume.…”
Section: Direct Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…when the temperature sensor is in direct thermal contact with the sample) and non-contact techniques (i.e. when the sample temperature is measured without the sensor being directly connected to the sample) (30,33,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52). Since during the direct MCE measurements a rapid change of the magnetic field is generally required, the measurements can be carried out on immobilized samples when the magnetic field change is provided either by charging/discharging the magnet, or by moving the sample in and out of a uniform magnetic field volume.…”
Section: Direct Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the direct experimental techniques depends on the errors in thermometry, errors in field setting, the quality of thermal isolation of the sample (this becomes a critical source of error when the MCE is large and thus disrupts the adiabatic conditions), and the quality of the compensation circuitry to eliminate the effect of the changing magnetic field on the temperature sensor. Considering all these effects the accuracy is claimed to be in the 5 to 10% range (30,33,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when the temperature sensor is in direct thermal contact with the sample) and non-contact techniques (i.e. when the sample temperature is measured without the sensor being directly connected to the sample) (30,33,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52). Since during the direct MCE measurements a rapid change of the magnetic field is generally required, the measurements can be carried out on immobilized samples when the magnetic field change is provided either by charging/discharging the magnet, or by moving the sample in and out of a uniform magnetic field volume.…”
Section: Direct Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the direct experimental techniques depends on the errors in thermometry, errors in field setting, the quality of thermal isolation of the sample (this becomes a critical source of error when the MCE is large and thus disrupts the adiabatic conditions), and the quality of the compensation circuitry to eliminate the effect of the changing magnetic field on the temperature sensor. Considering all these effects the accuracy is claimed to be in the 5 to 10% range (30,33,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52). The errors, however, may be considerably larger, particularly if one of the issues (see above) affecting the accuracy is not resolved properly.…”
Section: Direct Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%