1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0037646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumental response persistence following induction of hippocampal theta frequency during fixed-ratio responding in rats.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the extensive theoretical debate for and against the spatial (cognitive) mapping position on hippocampal function, there is a tradition of experimental research leading to a class of theories that have been more or less set aside. These are conceptualizations of hippocampal function in terms such as novelty, discrepancy, and habituation (e.g., Simonov, 1974;Vinogradova, 1975); suppression and inhibition (e.g., Douglas, 1967;Kimble, 1968;Altman et al, 1973); neuromodulatory effects (Isaacson, 1980); and, in the spirit of Vinogradova and Simonov, frustration, suppression, and persistence (e.g., Gray, 1970;Amsel et al, 1973;Glazer, 1974aGlazer, , 1974b, and the behavioral inhibition system (Gray, 1982). Angevine and Cotman (1981), in what could stand as a summary of this general kind of characterization of hippocampal function, wrote that "[Tlhe hippocampus holds the secret to limbic system function, or at least a large part of it.…”
Section: Neglected Theories Of Hippocampal Function: Their Relation Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the extensive theoretical debate for and against the spatial (cognitive) mapping position on hippocampal function, there is a tradition of experimental research leading to a class of theories that have been more or less set aside. These are conceptualizations of hippocampal function in terms such as novelty, discrepancy, and habituation (e.g., Simonov, 1974;Vinogradova, 1975); suppression and inhibition (e.g., Douglas, 1967;Kimble, 1968;Altman et al, 1973); neuromodulatory effects (Isaacson, 1980); and, in the spirit of Vinogradova and Simonov, frustration, suppression, and persistence (e.g., Gray, 1970;Amsel et al, 1973;Glazer, 1974aGlazer, , 1974b, and the behavioral inhibition system (Gray, 1982). Angevine and Cotman (1981), in what could stand as a summary of this general kind of characterization of hippocampal function, wrote that "[Tlhe hippocampus holds the secret to limbic system function, or at least a large part of it.…”
Section: Neglected Theories Of Hippocampal Function: Their Relation Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theta has, of course, been linked to other behavioural functions as well, for example, to voluntary action (e.g., Vander-wolf, 1971) and to spatial learning (O'Keefe & Nadel, 1978); but I find no inconsistency among these interpretations. Theta has also been linked in Gray's laboratory and mine, not only to anticipated frustration but also to reactions to novel or disruptive stimulation, the former being a special case of the latter in my general persistence theory (e.g., Amsel, 1972a; Amsel, Glazer, Lakey, McCuller & Wong, 1973; Glazer, 1972, 1974a, b). There is evidence from Vanderwolf's laboratory that the theta rhythm of the hippocampal EEG is first seen in rat pups around 11–12 days (Gillespie, 1974), which is just about the time we see the first paradoxical effect, the PREE, in rat pups.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Concomitantsmentioning
confidence: 99%