Instrumental and affective communication with patients with limited health literacy in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD

Abstract

Background Patients have a ‘need to know’ (instrumental need) and a ‘need to feel known’ (affective need). During consultations with patients with limited health literacy (LHL) in the palliative phase of their disease, both the instrumental and the affective communication skills of healthcare providers are important. The study aims to explore instrumental and affective communication between care providers and LHL patients in the palliative phase of COPD or cancer. Methods In 2018, consultations between LHL patients in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD and their healthcare providers were video-recorded in four hospitals in the Netherlands. As there was no observation algorithm available for this setting, several items were created to parameterize healthcare providers’ instrumental communication (seven items: understanding, patient priorities, medical status, treatment options, treatment consequences, prognosis, and information about emotional distress) and affective communication (six items: hope, support, reassurance, empathy, appreciation, and emotional coping). The degree of each item was recorded for each consultation, with relevant segments of the observation selected and transcribed to support the items. Results Consultations between 17 care providers and 39 patients were video-recorded and analyzed. Care providers primarily used instrumental communication, most often by giving information about treatment options and assessing patients’ care priorities. Care providers assessed patients’ understanding of their disease less often. The patients’ prognosis was not mentioned in half the consultations. Within the affective domain, the care providers did provide support for their patients; providing hope, reassurance, empathy, and appreciation and discussing emotional coping were observed less often. Conclusions Care providers used mostly instrumental communication, especially treatment information, in consultations with LHL patients in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD. Most care providers did not check if the patient understood the information, which is rather crucial, especially given patients’ limited level of health literacy. Healthcare providers did provide support for patients, but other expressions of affective communication by care providers were less common. To adapt the communication to LHL patients in palliative care, care providers could be less wordy and reduce the amount of information, use ‘teach-back’ techniques and pay more attention to affective communication.

How doctors manage conflicts with families of critically ill patients during conversations about end-of-life decisions in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care

“…There is growing evidence that limited health literacy and low socio-economic status negatively affect patients’ active participation in medical decision-making [ 46 , 47 ]. It has also been shown that doctors primarily use instrumental instead of empathic communication with this group of patients [ 48 ]. In our study, we observed the same tendency.…”

Towards an open and effective dialogue on complementary medicine in oncology: protocol of patient participatory study ‘COMMON’

“…Patients were approached by the hospital/research team by phone and when interested met by the research team, prior to the consultation when written consent was obtained. 33 …”

‘A basic understanding’; evaluation of a blended training programme for healthcare providers in hospital-based palliative care to improve communication with patients with limited health literacy

“…The e-learning was developed by Dialogue Trainer (technique) and Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities (content), in collaboration with and based on the outcomes of video-observations and subsequent (reflected practice) interviews carried out by Nivel [7,14,20]. For example, quotes from the real-life recorded consultations between HCPs and LHL patients in the palliative phase of their disease were used as input for the scenarios of the e-learning [14]. The goal of the e-learning was to help HCPs in hospital-based care to adapt and improve their communication skills with LHL patients in the palliative phase of their disease.…”

“…So far, limited research has been carried out in palliative care focusing on SDM and LHL patients [13]. Recent research from our team indicates that the assessment of LHL patients' understanding of their situation [14] and the implementation of SDM in palliative care, need improvement [15]. To improve communication and decision-making in hospital-based palliative care, we therefore developed and evaluated a blended training programme for healthcare professionals to improve communication with LHL patients.…”