Instructors' Attitudes toward Active Learning

Abstract

One of the major goals of science and technology education today is to promote students' active learning as a way to improve students' conceptual understanding and thinking skills. Although there is clear evidence for the benefits of active learning, most lecturers in higher education still adhere to traditional teaching methods. This research seeks to identify the characteristic attitudes of "active instructors" towards active learning and discerning a distinction between these attitudes and those of the remaining instructors. This study examined the attitudes of 153 lecturers in three higher education institutions in Israel. The research tool was an attitude questionnaire developed specially for this study on the basis of the experience of 7 "active instructors" exposing the process of change they had undergone moving from traditional teaching to more active instruction. An analysis of these interviews provided the basis for characterizing the attitudes of "active instructors" and subsequently for the development of the research questionnaire. On the basis of a literature review and an examination of the attitudes of the "active instructors," a content analysis was undertaken in which the attitudes were grouped into six key domains that can characterize the tendency of a lecturer to adopt active teaching. The findings reveal that in all these 6 domains there were significant differences between the attitudes of "active instructors" and their colleagues. This diagnostic tool can supply crucial information to the college and universities directors when planning supportive steps toward advancing active learning in their institutions.

Learning by Doing: Twenty Successful Active Learning Exercises for Information Systems Courses

“…Instructors with large classes are the most likely group of instructors to avoid the consideration of active learning exercises (Pundak, Herscovitz, Shacham, & Wiser-Biton, 2009). Instructors may also avoid using active learning if the instructor has a large amount of required material that must be covered in a class, meaning that quantity of content becomes more important than student understanding (Pundak et al, 2009). Even if an instructor is interested in active learning, it is likely that the instructor may have had zero to few role models demonstrating this method in their educational upbringing (Niemi, 2002).…”

The Relationship between the Teachers' Levels of Use and Their Demographic Characteristics in the Adoption of the Student-Active Learning Approach in EFL Classrooms in Oman: A Quantitative and Exploratory Relational Study

“…Such activities need students to have more interaction with their peers and their teachers where feedback is directly given as well as selfexperience related to course material is well used (Holtzman, 2005, cited in Pedersen, 2010. In this matter, the SAL approach inspires the students into self-analysis and expression (Van De Bogart, 2009), and enhances students' theoretical understanding and thinking skills through problem-solving as they collect, analyze, interpret and represent data (Pundak et al, 2009). …”

Using Conceptual Structures in the Design of Computer-Based Assessment Software

“…A teacher must be able to detect occurrences of conflict in the mind of a learner and select an appropriate approach for conflict resolution amongst many different possible approaches. A further potential challenge to be overcome are teachers' attitudes towards trying new teaching methods (Pundak et al 2009). Interestingly, changing a teacher's pre-existing belief about teaching methods may not be any easier than it is for students to overcome their misconceptions.…”