Mössbauer Effect Data Index 1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-5900-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructions on the Use of the Mössbauer Data Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At atomic level the elastic and inelastic parts of the electronic scattering are the Rayleigh and Compton components, whilst the nuclear resonant scattering is divided into nuclear-elastic events, in which the nucleus is left in the same ground-state sublevel as initially, and into nuclear-inelastic (or spin-flip) events in which the nuclear ground-state sublevel changes. These nuclear processes are illustrated in figure 2 which is based on the data in table 1, taken from Stevens and Stevens (1976). Incoherence arises at the atomic level through the atom being distinguishably different after the scattering event (and in principle 'labellable'), whilst it arises at the lattice level through some randomness in the scattering amplitudes a t the various sites.…”
Section: Classification Of Scattering Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At atomic level the elastic and inelastic parts of the electronic scattering are the Rayleigh and Compton components, whilst the nuclear resonant scattering is divided into nuclear-elastic events, in which the nucleus is left in the same ground-state sublevel as initially, and into nuclear-inelastic (or spin-flip) events in which the nuclear ground-state sublevel changes. These nuclear processes are illustrated in figure 2 which is based on the data in table 1, taken from Stevens and Stevens (1976). Incoherence arises at the atomic level through the atom being distinguishably different after the scattering event (and in principle 'labellable'), whilst it arises at the lattice level through some randomness in the scattering amplitudes a t the various sites.…”
Section: Classification Of Scattering Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperfine parameters for D1 components may be disturbed by the overlapping of parameters characteristic for magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles, ferrihydrite, or pyrite, the presence of which was not found in the XRD analysis. However, their presence cannot be excluded by analyzing the results contained in the paper of Stevens et al [ 25 ]. The differences between hyperfine parameters for the identified aluminosilicates can also be related to the differences in the chemical composition (iron content, as confirmed by chemical analysis carried out with the SEM-EDS method) of the identified components, which were determined by the ionic forms of iron in these compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality parameter of their fit (χ 2 ) did not exceed 2, and there were no differences between the curve illustrating the differences in the model and the experimental description, proving the presence of additional components. The mineralogical identification of hyperfine parameters was based on the Mössbauer Mineral Handbook [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%