2022
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/12710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional use of Geometer’s Sketchpad and students geometry learning motivation and problem-solving ability

Abstract: This study investigated Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) supported instruction and students’ geometry learning motivation and problem-solving ability (PSA). A pre-/post-test quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent comparison groups was used on two intact groups of grade 9. An instruction of four weeks’ duration was given to the intervention group. The motivation measuring questionnaire, self-efficacy measuring questionnaire, effort measuring questionnaire, and PSA measuring questions were used to collect data.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this effect, the study revealed that PSMTs who taught geometry using the TGIBL approach outperformed both PSMTs who were taught using the GIBL and conventional methods of instruction on attaining geometry conceptual and procedural knowledge. This study supported previous research findings by Yusuf and Afolabi (2010), Zulnaidi and Zakaria (2012), Donevska-Todorova (2015), Murni and Jehadus (2019), Salifu et al (2020), Tezer andCumhur (2017), Cesaria and Herman (2019), Yimer (2020), and Kotu and Weldeyesus (2022), in which learners taught using computer-based instruction outperformed those taught using non-computer-based instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this effect, the study revealed that PSMTs who taught geometry using the TGIBL approach outperformed both PSMTs who were taught using the GIBL and conventional methods of instruction on attaining geometry conceptual and procedural knowledge. This study supported previous research findings by Yusuf and Afolabi (2010), Zulnaidi and Zakaria (2012), Donevska-Todorova (2015), Murni and Jehadus (2019), Salifu et al (2020), Tezer andCumhur (2017), Cesaria and Herman (2019), Yimer (2020), and Kotu and Weldeyesus (2022), in which learners taught using computer-based instruction outperformed those taught using non-computer-based instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, GSP has a positive impact on learner learning outcomes in geometry, algebra, precalculus and calculus (Adelabu et al, 2019;Arbain & Shukor, 2014;Kotu & Weldeyesus, 2022;Zulnadi & Zamri, 2017). In her class of discrete mathematics, Quinn (1997) discovered that GSP is a crucial teaching tool for graph theory and PSMTs were able to verify or disprove certain graphstheory concepts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, studies reported that students' ability to perform scientific activities affected their learning motivation and vice versa. Motivation improves students' ability to solve problems (Kotu & Weldeyesus, 2022). On the other hand, a positive relationship was found between the two constructs (Debacker & Nelson, 2000).…”
Section: Level Of Motivation and Background Variables That Affect Itmentioning
confidence: 91%