Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional Design Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even though it seems that ID models represent a single linear process, Verstegen, Barnard, and Pilot () state that instructional designers must consider different kinds of constraints and limitations to respond appropriately to the contexts in which they work. In other words, instructional designers should make decisions based on the constraints in their particular settings (Gibbons, Boling, & Smith, ; Schwier, Campbell, & Kenny, ) rather than just following the steps of a model (Branch & Kopcha, ). Spector () also emphasizes that communication and interaction between the key stakeholders takes a great deal of effort during the design of instructional materials, a factor not included in ID models (e.g., Morrison, Ross, Kalman, & Kemp, ).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even though it seems that ID models represent a single linear process, Verstegen, Barnard, and Pilot () state that instructional designers must consider different kinds of constraints and limitations to respond appropriately to the contexts in which they work. In other words, instructional designers should make decisions based on the constraints in their particular settings (Gibbons, Boling, & Smith, ; Schwier, Campbell, & Kenny, ) rather than just following the steps of a model (Branch & Kopcha, ). Spector () also emphasizes that communication and interaction between the key stakeholders takes a great deal of effort during the design of instructional materials, a factor not included in ID models (e.g., Morrison, Ross, Kalman, & Kemp, ).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design models became associated with the designations instructional systems design/development (ISD) and ADDIE. Gibbons et al ( 2013 ) give a more detailed description of model proliferation.…”
Section: Isd Process Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith and Boling ( 2009 ) review the assumptions and misconceptions of design models that have evolved over that period. There is room to question whether the notion of a design model adequately describes what we know about design (Gibbons, Boling, & Smith, 2013 ;Gibbons & Yanchar, 2010 ). Gibbons and Yanchar ( 2010 ) identify a wide range of topics that would be included in a more robust description of design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, the educational design is a framework for the creative design process and ensuring that the learners' needs are met. The meaning of educational design depends on the individual's background and theory (27). The educational design process involves independent stages, including learner analysis, content and goals, designing goals, selecting strategies and evaluation tools, producing training materials, assessing the learner's performance, and measuring the effectiveness of the educational design (28).…”
Section: Concept Of Educational Designingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with educational methods such as formal approaches in developing training activities. The educational design is much more important when using educational technology than when face-to-face training is used since learning activities are explicitly planned professionally (27).…”
Section: Encouraging and Facilitating Reminding And Transferring Datamentioning
confidence: 99%