2014
DOI: 10.9782/2159-4341-17.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instruction, Not Inclusion, Should Be the Central Issue in Special Education: An Alternative View from the USA

Abstract: A focus on anything other than instruction undercuts the legal and moral rights of students with disabilities to an appropriate education and fails to produce substantive social justice. Differences among differences must be recognized to guarantee the civil educational rights to which people with disabilities are entitled. Instructionally-relevant differences include many disabilities, but they do not include such differences as skin hue, parentage, sexual orientation, national origin, and many other kinds of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most controversial issue currently regarding the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is that of inclusion (Farrell, ; Kauffman & Badar, ; Slee, ). Theories of inclusion and inclusive education have important implications for special education policies and practices in both developed and developing countries (Artiles et al., ; Singal & Muthukrishna, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most controversial issue currently regarding the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is that of inclusion (Farrell, ; Kauffman & Badar, ; Slee, ). Theories of inclusion and inclusive education have important implications for special education policies and practices in both developed and developing countries (Artiles et al., ; Singal & Muthukrishna, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kauffman (2012, 2013), Kauffman and Landrum (2009), Kauffman and Badar (2014b), and Zigmond and Kloo (2011) also noted that the arguments for a fundamental shift toward inclusion in the way we think of special education, plus misguided attempts to apply the civil rights arguments for nondisabled minority groups to the education of students with disabilities, have contributed to a shift in the attention of educators and policymakers from individuals to groups.…”
Section: The Issue Of Categories and The Nature Of Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the authors' opinion, more scientific research is needed to find out which types of schools are more effective for students with special educational needs. According to Kauffman & Badar (2014), it is wrong to state that education for disabled students does not differ from education for students who do not have disabilities or that special education does not require teachers' specific competencies. Florian (2013), Blanton, Pugach and Florian (2011) and other authors note that many teachers feel unprepared to educate students with special educational needs and do not want these students in their classes.…”
Section: The Overview Of Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kauffman & Badar (2014), special needs teachers must focus on the efficient development of specific academic and social abilities.…”
Section: 38 058mentioning
confidence: 99%