“…The present study aligns with some recent pedagogical work that has shown that explicit instruction centered on the concepts of self‐presentation, social distance, and power can have an appreciable effect on learners’ understanding of, and ability to use, pragmatic features such as T and V (e.g., van Compernolle, , ; van Compernolle & Henery, ). The approach—concept‐based pragmatics instruction—aims to provide high‐quality explanations of categories of meaning, and how they are enacted through the use of T and V. The term high‐quality as used here refers to explanations that are based on current sociolinguistic and pragmatic research that goes beyond quantitative tendencies (i.e., conventions, frequencies of use) and explores the meaning and significance of sociolinguistic phenomena in the lives of people who use the language (see van Compernolle, , ch.…”