Affirming LGBTQ+ Students in Higher Education. 2022
DOI: 10.1037/0000281-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutionalizing LGBTQ+ student support.

Abstract: Administrators must think strategically about the organizational structure of LGBTQ+ support resources to ensure that there is effective collaboration around resources for LGBTQ+ students, so these resources are not campus silos that further present challenges for LGBTQ+ students to find mentorship, support, and collaborations.• An institutional approach to LGBTQ+ student support should be grounded in knowledge of the overall history of student organizing-especially Black student organizing and the origins of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for these findings is differences in group privilege and persistent issues of institutionalized racism, even within LGBTQ+ groups. White students may benefit more than students of color from campus supports—that are grounded in and framed by a “White lens” (Singh, 2022)–further marginalizing students of color. White students also may be unaware of their privilege and assume that what works for them works for other (marginalized) members of their community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation for these findings is differences in group privilege and persistent issues of institutionalized racism, even within LGBTQ+ groups. White students may benefit more than students of color from campus supports—that are grounded in and framed by a “White lens” (Singh, 2022)–further marginalizing students of color. White students also may be unaware of their privilege and assume that what works for them works for other (marginalized) members of their community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While campus-based organizations, such as multicultural, diversity, and LGBTQ+ centers, may serve as sources of support for TNG students of color, these places also often “mask” the overall dominant identity of college campuses—specifically, White, cis, and heterosexual (Jourian, 2017; Singh, 2022). Even when campuses provide resources for gender identity exploration and community-building (e.g., LGBTQ+ centers, college-sanctioned LGBTQ+ and TNG-specific student groups), these spaces are often predominantly White, making them less safe and affirming for TNG students of color (Nicolazzo, 2016a, 2016b; Singh, 2022). In summation, given that members of race-based groups are predominately heterosexual and cis, and members of LGBTQ+ groups are predominately White and cis, these groups tend to focus on single-issues and may be oblivious to or ignorant of the unique needs of TNG students of color (Singh, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%