2002
DOI: 10.5465/3069294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutionalization as an Interplay Between Actions, Meanings, and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
332
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
332
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach was chosen based on the view that mediatization is constituted through and reflected in language and rules, and is incorporated into internal discourses (Zilber ; Brown et al ). Discourses manifest and represent organizations' ideas and rules about matters relevant for their performance and identity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was chosen based on the view that mediatization is constituted through and reflected in language and rules, and is incorporated into internal discourses (Zilber ; Brown et al ). Discourses manifest and represent organizations' ideas and rules about matters relevant for their performance and identity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of multiple institutional logics provides opportunities for institutional change in a field (Seo and Creed, ; Kilfoyle and Richardson, ). In some cases, the conflict of institutional logics results in confrontation and eventually the restabilization of the field based on a single logic (either the former dominant logic reasserts itself or a new logic gains dominance) (Purdy and Gray, ); in other cases a new institutional logic operates covertly and undermines the former logic until it emerges as the dominant logic (Zilber, ). However, it is also possible for multiple institutional logics to coexist over an extended period of time.…”
Section: Institutional Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, convergence requires institutional change, that is, a multifaceted transformation of rules, norms, and cognition—each of which may change at different rates (Jonnergård, Kärreman & Svensson 2004; R. Scott 2001; Townley 2002; Zilber 2002). Richard Scott (2001, chapter 3) argues that the three necessary pillars of institutions: cognitive, regulative, and normative (ibid.…”
Section: Convergence From An Institutional Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different pillars may be out of step with each other; for example, the people's cognition may be aligned with a new institution, while their norms may remain steadfastly connected to an older institution (Jonnergård, Kärreman & Svensson 2004). Complete institutionalization demands consistency between cognition, norms, and practices, and is often measured through the actions it brings about (Zilber 2002). The sequences of institutional change are, however, not pre‐determined (Jonnergård, Kärreman & Svensson 2004).…”
Section: Convergence From An Institutional Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation