Institutionalisation and the Persistence of the Sticky AASR in the Post-Cold War Era

Xu, Ruike

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49619-1_5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…That is, there is path-dependence permitting and constraining these alliance systems’ ability to create tools and decide and enact measures for adapting to and countering new challenges and threats in a more uncertain and disordered international system (Moon & Rhyu, 2010; Xu, 2017; Yeo, 2011). On the one hand, the optimistic version of the narrative views this path-dependence as containing well-grounded, cooperation-based, experience-based, common-interest-focused, shared-identity-driven resources that could allow the Euro-Atlantic and Asia-Pacific alliance partners to help repair and positively reform the fraying international order.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

US-led Alliances and Contemporary International Security Disorder: Comparative Responses of the Transatlantic and Asia-Pacific Alliance Systems

Richey

2019

Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

US-led security architectures in the Asia-Pacific and Europe are experiencing pressure due to ongoing geostrategic transformation in these regions, most notably the rapid expansion of China’s power, North Korea’s nuclear brinkmanship and Russia’s renewed aggressive adventurism. These readjustments have often been examined through the prism of changing balance of power between the US-led liberal international forces and revisionist powers aiming to alter the international order. Going beyond this analysis in the literature, this article sheds lights on the ways in which the USA has attempted and is attempting to reshape US-led alliances in the Asia-Pacific and Europe. The article finds that the US-led alliance systems and security partnerships will continue to evolve divergently due both to their different path-dependent identities and the different types of challenges they face regionally.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

US-led Alliances and Contemporary International Security Disorder: Comparative Responses of the Transatlantic and Asia-Pacific Alliance Systems

Richey

2019

Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Institutionalisation and the Persistence of the Sticky AASR in the Post-Cold War Era

Cited by 1 publication

References 8 publications

US-led Alliances and Contemporary International Security Disorder: Comparative Responses of the Transatlantic and Asia-Pacific Alliance Systems

US-led Alliances and Contemporary International Security Disorder: Comparative Responses of the Transatlantic and Asia-Pacific Alliance Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About