1993
DOI: 10.1080/10835547.1993.12090714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Real Estate Investment Practices: Swedish and United States Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Brzeski et ai., (1993( ), Louargand (1992 and Rydin et ai., (1990). They reported that Swedish institutional investors were primarily seeking "long-term real retum on equity" for their property investments ( all types ).…”
Section: Respondents Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar results were reported by Brzeski et ai., (1993( ), Louargand (1992 and Rydin et ai., (1990). They reported that Swedish institutional investors were primarily seeking "long-term real retum on equity" for their property investments ( all types ).…”
Section: Respondents Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the possibility of providing multiple answer options, for instance, when asking for risk assessment techniques, made it difficult to evaluate the relative importance of certain findings. o Most were evaluated by total expected return, followed by cash flow from operations Other relevant findings • 72% and 50% diversified their portfolio by location and property size, respectively • An increasing focus was put on multi-period return models as opposed to single-period assessments Brzeski, Jaffe and Lundström (1993) were the first researchers to undertake a survey about real estate decision-making practices in continental Europe. They surveyed 215 real estate investors in Sweden.…”
Section: Early Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I split my group of participants into firms focusing on core and those focusing on value-add investments so that the data is valid and comparable. Apart from that, Brzeski et al (1993) faced the previously discussed issue of biases resulting from mail surveys, which I avoid in my thesis by choosing a different approach to data gathering. De Wit (1996) was the first real estate decision-making researcher to interview respondents face-to-face and not via mail, thereby avoiding poor response rates and a pre-defined answer set.…”
Section: Early Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%