2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional pressure and waste reduction: The role of investments in waste reduction resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(152 reference statements)
2
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarkis et al [26] notes the importance of external drivers such as regulatory, competitive, customer, and stakeholder pressure in explaining supply chain management decisions. Simpson [27] finds that external factors, specifically customer pressure and regulatory pressure, influence adoption of waste reduction practices. Heterogeneity in organizational response to institutional pressures could be due to internal forces within the firm that cause inertia or cultural barriers to change [25] and in managerial attitudes and commitment towards environmental responsibility [28].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkis et al [26] notes the importance of external drivers such as regulatory, competitive, customer, and stakeholder pressure in explaining supply chain management decisions. Simpson [27] finds that external factors, specifically customer pressure and regulatory pressure, influence adoption of waste reduction practices. Heterogeneity in organizational response to institutional pressures could be due to internal forces within the firm that cause inertia or cultural barriers to change [25] and in managerial attitudes and commitment towards environmental responsibility [28].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have used institutional factors to explore different dimensions of firms (Arndt, ; Oliver, ; Homburg et al, ; Grewal and Dharwadkar, ; Davidsson et al, ; Auh and Menguc, ; Peng et al, ; Simpson, ; Gaur et al, ; Shou et al, ; Chittoor et al, ; Hong et al, ). Although some studies have shown the direct and positive effect of the institutional factors on organizations’ performance (Peng and Luo, ; Li and Zhang, ; Zhang and Li, ), some have considered this effect and relationship under several conditions (Siegel, ; Li et al, ; Okhmatovskiy, ; Sheng et al, ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() employed a combination of the RBV and institutional theory to show that firms can use unique institutional advantages to change export strategies. Simpson () also examined firms’ performance using integrated approach of the RBV and institutional theory. He examined resources such as equipment and personnel and institutional pressures such as customer pressures, laws and regulations, and cost pressures in firms.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Muduli et al [38] different barriers are considered, for example, information gap, insufficient society pressure, and poor legislation. Simpson [39] analyzed the environmental performance improvements due to waste reduction and Mavi et al [40] applied a methodology to evaluate the green suppliers.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Field According To The Main Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39][40] and the resource base view theory became more diffused. [41][42][43][44] Another interesting observation is that the most of the papers collected data using survey of Chinese or Taiwan enterprises.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Field According To The Main Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%