“…To begin, while the institutional logics perspective is profoundly cultural in its orientation, informed by the cultural turn that swept across the social sciences and humanities in the late 20th century (e.g., Friedland & Mohr, 2004), it is important to emphasize that most logics research since the seminal paper by Friedland and Alford (1991) has emphasized that logics are relatively enduring configurations of symbolic beliefs and material practices. Somewhat differently, Haveman, Joseph-Goteiner, and Li (2023) note the importance of practice, but they conceptualize logics and practice as relatively distinct, albeit interrelated. We prefer to conceptualize practices as more fundamental to the concept of logic and believe that the most powerful scholarship on institutional logics is undergirded by a practice theoretic approach to culture (e.g., Bourdieu, 1998;Lizardo & Strand, 2010;Swidler, 1986) that accords practices a more central role in both theory and empirical analysis.…”