Institutional Logics and Diverging Organizational Forms: An Empirical Study in Russia

Abstract

Using an institutional logics approach, this study investigates how the institutional logics of leaders of grassroots social service nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Russia changed over time and how these changes related to changes in organizational mission, people served, professionalization, and interactions with the government. Relying on interviews as well as other data gathered, this analysis of organizational leaders’ narratives reveals the identities and experiences that these leaders turn to in their sensemaking of significant events. The findings show that, on the one hand, social welfare NGOs continued to provide services, increased their advocacy efforts, and professionalized their staff. Volunteer organizations, on the other hand, discontinued provision of social services turning instead to the recruitment and development of volunteers. Theoretically, this empirical case illustrates how an interplay of factors at multiple levels can affect the expression of logics at the organizational level.

States of responds to conflicting institutional logics: power dynamics and the role of management reports

“…One research direction is mainly concerned with how organizations react to external demands from their organizational field and how macro- and meso-levels of logics influence organizational change (Thornton et al , 2012; Wathen, 2020). Greenwood et al (2011) and Pache and Santos (2010) illustrate how most of the extant research involves a macro level of inquiry, i.e.…”

Introduction to the Issue

“…In the third Research Article, Wathen (2020) investigates how the institutional logics of leaders of grassroots social service nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Russia changed over time and how these changes related to changes in organizational mission, people served, professionalization, and interactions with the government. The findings show that, on the one hand, social welfare NGOs continued to provide services, increased their advocacy efforts, and professionalized their staff.…”