Institutional-level drivers of gender-inequitable scientific career progression in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Background This study sought to determine how institutional environments, including values, policies, and their implementation, shape inequities in scientific career progression for women and men, and their disadvantages in relation to their multiple social identities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The findings are drawn from a wider research study that was aimed at gaining an in-depth understanding of the barriers and enablers of gender-equitable scientific career progression for researchers in SSA. This was nested within the context of the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa) programme—a health-based scientific research capacity-strengthening initiative. Methods The study adopted an exploratory qualitative cross-sectional study design. In-depth interviews (IDIs) with trainees/research fellows at various career stages supported and/or affiliated to three purposively selected DELTAS Africa Research Consortia were the main method of data collection. In addition, key informant interviews (KIIs) with consortia research leaders/directors, co-investigators, and the consortia management team were also conducted to corroborate information gathered from the IDIs, and also to provide additional insights on the drivers of intersectional gender-inequitable career progression. In total, 58 IDIs (32 female and 26 male) and 20 KIIs (4 female and 16 male) were conducted. The interviews were carried out in English between May and December 2018. The data were analysed inductively based on emergent themes. Results Three interrelated themes were identified: first, characterization of the institutional environment as highly complex and competitive with regard to advancement opportunities and funding structure; second, inequitable access to support systems within institutions; third, informal rules—everyday experiences of negative practices and culture at the workplace, characterized by negative stereotypical attitudes, gender biases, sexual harassment, and bullying and intimidation. Conclusions We contend that understanding and addressing the social power relations at the meso-institutional environment and macro-level contexts could benefit career progression of both female and male researchers by improving work culture and practices, resource allocation, and better rules and policies, thus fostering positive avenues for systemic and structural policy changes.

“Mobilizing our leaders”: A multi-country qualitative study to increase the representation of women in global health leadership

“…Our data contributes to the extremely limited evidence-based research on interventions to address gender discrimination, harassment, and assault in academic institutions in LMICs [19]. Participants in our study suggested a package of four major approaches that should be implemented simultaneously to increase female retention, productivity, and advancement in health careers.…”

“…This study responds to the urgent need to amplify the voices of women in global health, with an emphasis on those from LMICs. Prior work has quantified the challenges preventing women's promotion to leadership positions in global health, with more than three-fourths of women in the field reporting challenges with work-life balance, and more than half reporting facing gender bias and discrimination, and sexual assault [19,20]. Only limited qualitative research which explores the spectrum and severity of barriers has been conducted.…”

Examining Barriers to Entry: Disparate Gender Representation in Cybersecurity Within Sub-Saharan Africa

“…If women manage to enter the workforce in SSA, various issues are yet again at play. Institutional power relations within the region are often underpinned by patriarchal, capitalist, and neo-colonial values (Liani, Nyamongo, Pulford, & Tolhurst, 2021). Participants within the study by Liani et al indicated various institutional problems faced by many women within SSA.…”

How international research consortia can strengthen organisations’ research systems and promote a conducive environment and culture

“…It takes considerable—and frequently underestimated—time and resources to break down barriers and to create trusting and respectful relationships among disciplines 27 28. Unless this process is managed well and early, disunity can build up29 and consortium members may become stressed and demotivated, which may jeopardise the functioning of the whole consortium 18 30 31…”