“…In other cases, critical and constructivist research was combined, where, for example, the researchers started their data collection in a constructivist manner, and they built their findings around their subjects' sense-making, while the analysis process seemed to be rather critical, for example, in Alberti and Danaj (2017) or Hadjisolomou et al (2017). Finally, the transition zone between the positivist and critical paradigm resulted a study featuring quantitative data collection with the help of a questionnaire in Portugal and in Mozambique, which ended up in postcolonial analysis (Dibben et al, 2017), which was a somewhat logical analytical frame in the given cultural contexts. All these articles were clearly identifiable with two paradigms, although they were not multi-paradigmatic research (Lewis and Grimes, 1999;Lewis and Kelemen, 2002), because in these cases, the researchers did not keep the two paradigmatic analyses separate, which is a distinctive feature of multiparadigm analysis.…”